Comparative analysis of groundwater contaminant sources identification based on simulation optimization and ensemble Kalman filter

被引:0
作者
Jiuhui Li
Zhengfang Wu
Hongshi He
Wenxi Lu
机构
[1] Northeast Normal University,Key Laboratory of Geographical Processes and Ecological Security in Changbai Mountains, Ministry of Education, School of Geographical Sciences
[2] University of Missouri,School of Natural Resource
[3] Jilin University,Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education
[4] Jilin University,College of New Energy and Environment
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Comparative analysis; Ensemble Kalman filter; Groundwater contamination; Simulation optimization; Source identification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The location and release history of groundwater contaminant sources (GCSs) are usually unknown after groundwater contamination is detected, thereby greatly hindering the design of contamination remediation schemes and contamination risk assessments. Many previous studies have used prior information such as the observed contaminant concentrations (OCC) to obtain information of GCSs, and various methods have been proposed for identifying GCSs, including simulation optimization (S/O) and ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) methods. For the first time, the present study compared the suitability of the S/O and EnKF methods for GCSs identification based on two case studies by specifically considering the calculation time and effectiveness of GCS identification. The results showed that EnKF could reduce the calculation time required by more than 62% compared with S/O. However, the time saved did not compensate for the poor accuracy of the GCSs identification results. When the simulated contaminant concentrations (SCC) were used for GCSs identification, the MRE of the identification results with the S/O and EnKF methods were 2.79% and 5.09% in case one, respectively, and were 4.75% and 6.72% in case two. When the OCC were used for GCSs identification, the MRE of the identification results with the S/O and EnKF methods were 27.77% and 110.74% in case one, respectively, and 27.53% and 60.61% in case two. The identification results obtained using the EnKF method were not credible and the superior performance of the S/O method was obvious, thereby indicating that the EnKF method is much less suitable for actual GCSs identification compared with the S/O method.
引用
收藏
页码:90081 / 90097
页数:16
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]  
Ala NK(1992)Inverse analytical techniques applied to coincident contaminant distributions at Oits Air Force Base, Massachusetts Ground Water 30 212-218
[2]  
Domenico PA(2010)A linked simulation–optimization model for solving the unknown groundwater pollution source identification problems J Contam Hydrol 117 46-59
[3]  
Ayvaz MT(2015)A review of surrogate models and their application to groundwater modeling Water Resour Res 51 5957-5973
[4]  
Asher MJ(2016)A hybrid simulation–optimization approach for solving the areal groundwater pollution source identification problems J Hydrol 538 161-176
[5]  
Croke FWB(2010)Locating monitoring wells in groundwater systems using embedded optimization and simulation models Sci Total Environ 408 2189-2198
[6]  
Jakeman AJ(2021)Contaminant-source detection in a water distribution system using the ensemble Kalman filter J Water Resour Plan Manag 147 04021029-34
[7]  
Ayvaz MT(2012)Response surface strategies in constructing statistical bubble flow models for the development of a novel bubble column simulation approach Comput Chem Eng 36 22-1084
[8]  
Bashi-Azghadi SN(2018)Joint identification of contaminant source and aquifer geometry in a sandbox experiment with the restart Ensemble Kalman filter J Hydrol 564 1074-57
[9]  
Kerachian R(2009)Simultaneous identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources and estimation of aquifer parameters J Hydrol 376 48-36
[10]  
Butera I(2011)Identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources using classical optimization with linked simulation J Hydro Environ Res 5 25-790