Probability of earthquake occurrence and magnitude estimation in the post shut-in phase of geothermal projects

被引:0
作者
Andreas Barth
Friedemann Wenzel
Cornelius Langenbruch
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT),Geophysical Institute
[2] Freie Universität Berlin,Institute of Geological Sciences
来源
Journal of Seismology | 2013年 / 17卷
关键词
Induced seismicity; Shut-in; Post-injection; Probability; EGS; value; Soultz-sous-Forêts; Basel;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Induced seismicity in geothermal projects is observed to continue after shut-in of the fluid injection. Recent experiments show that the largest events tend to occur after the termination of injection. We use a probabilistic approach based on Omori’s law and the Gutenberg–Richter magnitude–frequency distribution to demonstrate that the probability of exceeding a certain maximum magnitude still increases after shut-in. This increase is governed by the exponent of Omori’s law q and the Gutenberg–Richter b value. For a reduced b value in the post-injection phase, the probability of occurrence directly after shut-in can be even higher than the corresponding probability for an ongoing injection. For the reference case of q = 2 and a 10% probability at shut-in time tS to exceed a given maximum magnitude, we obtain an increase to 14.6% for t = 2tS at a constant Gutenberg–Richter b value after shut-in. A reduction of the b value by one quarter leads to a probability of 20.5%. If we consider a constant probability level of occurrence for an event larger than a given magnitude at shut-in time, this maximum magnitude increases by 0.12 units for t = 2tS (0.26 units for a reduced b value). For the Soultz-sous-Forêts (France) injection experiment in 2000, recent studies reveal q = 9.5 and a b value reduction by 14%. A magnitude 2.3 event 9 h after shut-in falls in the phase with a probability higher than for the continued injection. The probability of exceeding the magnitude of this post-injection event is determined to 97.1%.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 11
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Aki K(1965)Maximum likelihood estimate of Bull Earthq Res Inst 43 237-239
  • [2] Bachmann CE(2011) in the formula log Geophys J Int 186 793-807
  • [3] Wiemer S(2007) =  Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44 1091-1105
  • [4] Woessner J(2008) −  Pure Appl Geophys 165 797-828
  • [5] Hainzl S(2008) and its confidence limits Geothermics 37 469-495
  • [6] Charléty J(2010)Statistical analysis of the induced Basel 2006 earthquake sequence: introducing a probability-based monitoring approach for enhanced geothermal systems Geophysics 75 53-62
  • [7] Cuenot N(2011)Large earthquakes during hydraulic stimulations at the geothermal site of Soultz-sous-Forêts Geophys Res Lett 38 21302-222
  • [8] Dorbath L(2007)Analysis of the microseismicity induced by fluid injections at the EGS site of Soultz-sous-Forêts (Alsace, France): implications for the characterization of the geothermal reservoir properties Geothermics 36 185-309
  • [9] Dorbath C(2004)Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system Geophys Res Lett 31 17609-103
  • [10] Haessler H(2004)Decay rate of fluid induced seismicity after termination of reservoir stimulations Geophys Res Lett 31 2612-undefined