Use of Tracer Kinetic Models for Selection of Semi-Quantitative Features for DCE-MRI Data Classification

被引:0
作者
R. Fusco
A. Petrillo
M. Petrillo
M. Sansone
机构
[1] “Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale”-IRCCS,Division of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiant and Metabolic Therapy
[2] University “Federico II”,Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies
来源
Applied Magnetic Resonance | 2013年 / 44卷
关键词
Feature Selection; Area Under Curve; Feature Subset; Arterial Input Function; Total Acquisition Time;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to identify, on the basis of simulated tracer kinetic data, the best subset of semi-quantitative features suitable for classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data. 1926 time concentration curves (TCCs) of Type III, IV and V [according to the classification of Daniel et al. (Radiology 209(2): 499–509 (1998))] were simulated using the gamma capillary transit time model and the Parker’s arterial input function. TCCs were converted in time intensity curves (TICs) corresponding to a gradient echo sequence. Seventeen semi-quantitative shape descriptors were extracted from each TIC. Feature selection in combination with classification and regression tree was adopted. Several acquisition parameters (total duration, time resolution, noise level) were used to simulate TICs to evaluate the influence on the features selected and on the overall accuracy. The highest accuracy (99.8 %) was obtained using 5 features, total duration 9 min and time resolution 60 s. However, an accuracy of 93.5 % was achieved using only 3 features, total duration 6 min and time resolution 60 s. This latter configuration has the advantage of requiring the smallest number of features (easily understandable by the radiologist) and not a very long duration (reduced patient discomfort).
引用
收藏
页码:1311 / 1324
页数:13
相关论文
共 191 条
[1]  
Tofts PS(1997)Pharmacokinetic mapping for lesion classification in dynamic breast MRI J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 7 91-101
[2]  
Tofts PS(1999)undefined J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10 223-232
[3]  
Brix G(1991)undefined J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 15 621-628
[4]  
Buckley DL(1998)undefined J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 18 1365-1377
[5]  
Evelhoch JL(1999)undefined Magn. Reson. Med. 42 42-52
[6]  
Henderson E(2012)undefined Magn. Reson. Med. 209 499-509
[7]  
Knopp MV(1998)undefined Radiology 25 604-612
[8]  
Larsson HB(2007)undefined Magn. Reson. Imaging 56 5665-5678
[9]  
Lee TY(2011)undefined Phys. Med. Biol. 31 1371-1378
[10]  
Mayr NA(2010)undefined J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 8 781-787