Umbrella review and network meta-analysis of diagnostic imaging test accuracy studies in Differentiating between brain tumor progression versus pseudoprogression and radionecrosis

被引:7
作者
Dagher, Richard [1 ]
Gad, Mona [2 ]
de Santana, Paloma da Silva [3 ]
Sadeghi, Mohammad Amin [4 ]
Yewedalsew, Selome F. [4 ]
Gujar, Sachin K. [5 ]
Yedavalli, Vivek [5 ]
Kohler, Cristiano Andre [5 ]
Khan, Majid [6 ]
Tavora, Daniel Gurgel Fernandes [6 ]
Kamson, David Olayinka [7 ]
Sair, Haris I. [1 ]
Luna, Licia P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Div Neuroradiol, 600 N Wolfe St Phipps B100F, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Diagnost Radiol Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[3] Tiradentes Univ Med Sch, Maceio, AL, Brazil
[4] SUNY Downstate HSC & Univ, Brooklyn, NY USA
[5] Univ Fed Ceara, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Med Sci Postgrad Program, Fortaleza, Brazil
[6] Fortaleza Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Fortaleza, Brazil
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Radiation necrosis; Radionecrosis; Pseudoprogression; Tumor recurrence; Network meta-analysis; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-SPECTROSCOPY; HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION NECROSIS; RECURRENCE; PERFORMANCE; PET; POSTTREATMENT; GLIOBLASTOMA; METASTASES;
D O I
10.1007/s11060-023-04528-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeIn this study we gathered and analyzed the available evidence regarding 17 different imaging modalities and performed network meta-analysis to find the most effective modality for the differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and post-treatment radiation effects.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive systematic search on PubMed and Embase. The quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) instrument. For each meta-analysis, we recalculated the effect size, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio from the individual study data provided in the original meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Imaging technique comparisons were then assessed using NMA. Ranking was assessed using the multidimensional scaling approach and by visually assessing surface under the cumulative ranking curves.ResultsWe identified 32 eligible studies. High confidence in the results was found in only one of them, with a substantial heterogeneity and small study effect in 21% and 9% of included meta-analysis respectively. Comparisons between MRS Cho/NAA, Cho/Cr, DWI, and DSC were most studied. Our analysis showed MRS (Cho/NAA) and 18F-DOPA PET displayed the highest sensitivity and negative likelihood ratios. 18-FET PET was ranked highest among the 17 studied techniques with statistical significance. APT MRI was the only non-nuclear imaging modality to rank higher than DSC, with statistical insignificance, however.ConclusionThe evidence regarding which imaging modality is best for the differentiation between radiation necrosis and post-treatment radiation effects is still inconclusive. Using NMA, our analysis ranked FET PET to be the best for such a task based on the available evidence. APT MRI showed promising results as a non-nuclear alternative.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis: accuracy of current imaging modalities [J].
Alexiou, George A. ;
Tsiouris, Spyridon ;
Kyritsis, Athanasios P. ;
Voulgaris, Spyridon ;
Argyropoulou, Maria I. ;
Fotopoulos, Andreas D. .
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 95 (01) :1-11
[2]   Brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy to differentiate recurrent neoplasm from radiation necrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Aseel, Almusaedi ;
McCarthy, Peter ;
Mohammed, Alsaddi .
JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2023, 33 (02) :189-201
[3]   A meta-analysis of studies using MR spectroscopy for evaluating suspicious lesions after radiation therapy of primary brain tumors [J].
Belkic, Dzevad ;
Belkic, Karen .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 50 (09) :2527-2557
[4]   Healthcare resource use, comorbidity, treatment and clinical outcomes for patients with primary intracranial tumors: a Swedish population-based register study [J].
Bergqvist, Jenny ;
Iderberg, Hanna ;
Mesterton, Johan ;
Bengtsson, Nils ;
Wettermark, Bjorn ;
Henriksson, Roger .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2017, 56 (03) :405-414
[5]   Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: Pitfalls in neurooncology [J].
Brandes, Alba A. ;
Tosoni, Alicia ;
Spagnolli, Federica ;
Frezza, Giarnpiero ;
Leonardi, Marco ;
Calbucci, Fabio ;
Franceschi, Enrico .
NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 10 (03) :361-367
[6]  
BURGER PC, 1979, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V44, P1256, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197910)44:4<1256::AID-CNCR2820440415>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-T
[8]   Imaging modalities in high-grade gliomas: Pseudoprogression, recurrence, or necrosis? [J].
Caroline, I. ;
Rosenthal, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (05) :633-637
[9]   Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA [J].
Chaimani, Anna ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Mavridis, Dimitris ;
Spyridonos, Panagiota ;
Salanti, Georgia .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10)
[10]   Differentiation between glioma recurrence and treatment effects using amide proton transfer imaging: A miniBayesian bivariate meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Kai ;
Jiang, Xi-Wen ;
Deng, Li-jing ;
She, Hua-Long .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12