Current practice of Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma

被引：0
作者：
Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Gregor Mikuz
Rafael J. Luque
Roberta Mazzucchelli
Rodolfo Montironi
机构：
[1] Reina Sofia University Hospital and Cordoba University Medical School,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine
[2] University of Innsbruck School of Medicine,Department of Pathology
[3] University Hospital of Jaen,Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology
[4] Polytechnic University of the Marche Region,undefined
来源：
Virchows Archiv | 2006年 / 448卷
关键词：
Prostate cancer; Gleason grade; Gleason score; Prostate biopsy; Radical prostatectomy;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The Gleason grading system remains one of the most powerful prognostic factors in prostate cancer and is the dominant method around the world in daily practice. It is based solely on the glandular architecture performed at low magnification. The Gleason grading system should be performed in needle core biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens where it shows a reasonable degree of correlation between both specimens, and most importantly, it remains vital in the treatment decision-making process. This review summarizes the current status of Gleason grading in prostate cancer, incorporating recent proposals for the best contemporary practice of prostate cancer grading.
引用
收藏
页码：111 / 118
页数：7
相关论文
共 234 条
[1]  
Allsbrook WC(2001)Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists Hum Pathol 32 74-80
[2]  
Mangold KA(2001)Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist Hum Pathol 32 81-88
[3]  
Johnson MH(2005)Prognostic and predictive factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 216 20-33
[4]  
Lane RB(1994)Analysis of cribriform morphology in prostatic neoplasia using antibody to high-molecular-weight cytokeratins Arch Pathol Lab Med 118 260-264
[5]  
Lane CG(2004)Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer J Urol 171 177-181
[6]  
Amin MB(2001)Analysis of clinicopathologic factors predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy Cancer 91 1414-1422
[7]  
Bostwick DG(1966)Survival rates of patients with prostatic cancer, tumor stage, and differentiation–preliminary report Cancer Chemother Rep 50 129-136
[8]  
Humphrey PA(2004)Handling and pathology reporting of prostate biopsies Eur Urol 46 177-181
[9]  
Jones EC(1994)Gleason grading of prostatic needle biopsies. Correlation with grade in 316 matched prostatectomies Am J Surg Pathol 18 796-803
[10]  
Reuter VE(2000)Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999 Arch Pathol Lab Med 124 995-1000
12345678910