Identification of ‘Sib’ plants in hybrid cauliflowers using microsatellite markers

被引:0
|
作者
Ida A. Astarini
Julie A. Plummer
Rachel A. Lancaster
Guijun Yan
机构
[1] The University of Western Australia,Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences
[2] Universitas Udayana,Jurusan Biology, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam
[3] Department of Agriculture,undefined
[4] Western Australia,undefined
来源
Euphytica | 2008年 / 164卷
关键词
var. ; Cytoplasmic male sterility; Self-inbred; Self-incompatibility; SSR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hybrid cauliflowers have been developed to exploit heterosis and to improve uniformity of production. Two breeding systems are commonly employed, self-incompatibility (SI) and cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS). Sibs, assumed to be self-inbred, often contaminate hybrid seed lots in the SI system and whilst self-inbreeding is not possible in the CMS system, plants that look like sibs occur. The objective of this study was to develop microsatellite markers for male and female cauliflower parent lines of both SI and CMS systems and to use them to screen sibs and aberrant plants in F1 hybrids. Fifty six pairs of microsatellite primers were screened and 8 primer pairs produced co-dominant markers in parent plants and two pairs of markers were chosen for purity testing of F1 hybrid seeds. Controlled pollinations were conducted in the glasshouse to produce hybrid and selfed-seeds. These seeds were grown in a field trial to identify morphologically normal and sib plants and to assess the reliability of microsatellite markers in detecting sib plants. Microsatellite analysis of morphological sib plants from the SI system revealed that these were not always self-inbred, in contrast, most self-inbred plants showed normal growth. Similarly, all morphological sibs from the CMS system showed hybrid bands. This suggests that morphological sibs were not always due to selfing but possibly to an interaction between genetic and environmental factors and this requires further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 316
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identification of new microsatellite markers in Panax ginseng
    Kim, Joonki
    Jo, Beom Ho
    Lee, Kyoung Lyong
    Yoon, Eui-Soo
    Ryu, Gi Hyung
    Chung, Ki Wha
    MOLECULES AND CELLS, 2007, 24 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [32] Identification of Grapevine Clone Genotypes by Microsatellite Markers
    Nikkhah, R.
    Ghaderi, N.
    II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNDERUTILIZED PLANT SPECIES: CROPS FOR THE FUTURE - BEYOND FOOD SECURITY, 2013, 979 : 791 - 796
  • [33] Specificity and sensitivity of microsatellite markers for the identification of larvae
    Morgan T.S.
    Rogers A.D.
    Marine Biology, 2001, 139 (5) : 967 - 973
  • [34] Identification of three Sorex species with microsatellite markers
    Basset, P
    Hausser, J
    MAMMALIA, 2003, 67 (02) : 245 - 252
  • [35] Soybean cultivar identification and genetic purity analysis using microsatellite DNA markers
    Meesang, N
    Ranamukhaarachchi, SL
    Petersen, MJ
    Andersen, SB
    SEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 29 (03) : 637 - 645
  • [36] Identification of salmonid fish using microsatellite markers with identical PCR-primers
    L. A. Zhivotovsky
    E. G. Shaikhaev
    M. V. Shitova
    Russian Journal of Marine Biology, 2013, 39 : 447 - 454
  • [37] Identification of seeds ofPinus species by Microsatellite Markers
    Fu Xiang-xiang
    Shi Ji-sen
    Journal of Forestry Research, 2005, 16 (4) : 281 - 284
  • [38] Specificity and sensitivity of microsatellite markers for the identification of larvae
    Morgan, TS
    Rogers, AD
    MARINE BIOLOGY, 2001, 139 (05) : 967 - 973
  • [39] Chromosome doubling of pear haploid plants and homozygosity assessment using isozyme and microsatellite markers
    L. Bouvier
    Ph. Guérif
    M. Djulbic
    Ch.-E. Durel
    E. Chevreau
    Y. Lespinasse
    Euphytica, 2002, 123 : 255 - 262
  • [40] Identification of Salmonid Fish Using Microsatellite Markers with Identical PCR-Primers
    Zhivotovsky, A.
    Shaikhaev, E. G.
    Shitova, M. V.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF MARINE BIOLOGY, 2013, 39 (06) : 447 - 454