The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor-activating antibodies in renal allograft vascular rejection

被引:0
作者
Duska Dragun
机构
[1] Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Center for Cardiovascular Research Medical Faculty of the Charité Berlin,
[2] Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine,undefined
[3] Charité Campus Virchow Clinic,undefined
来源
Pediatric Nephrology | 2007年 / 22卷
关键词
Vascular rejection; Non-HLA antibodies; Alloantibodies; Angiotensin II; AT1 receptor; Kidney transplantation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Acute rejection with vascular involvement remains a challenging problem in renal allotransplantation. Fibrinoid necrosis of the arteries with secondary thrombotic occlusions is C4d negative in 50% of cases and has the worst prognosis among all allograft vascular lesions. Nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) non-complement-fixing antibodies reacting to artery-specific antigens have been speculated to be responsible for causing severe vascular injury. We recently reported the presence of agonistic antibodies against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R-AA) in 16 recipients of renal allografts who had severe vascular rejection and malignant hypertension but who did not have anti-HLA antibodies. AT1R-AA stimulate AT1R and induce mediators of inflammation and thrombosis. Removal of AT1R-AA by plasmapheresis in combination with pharmacologic AT1R blockade leads to improved renal function and graft survival in AT1R-AA-positive patients. We have shown that the analysis of the subtle diagnostic and mechanistic differences may help to identify patients at particular risk and improve outcome of rejections with vascular pathology.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 914
页数:3
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Meier-Kriesche HU(2004)Long-term renal allograft survival: have we made significant progress or is it time time to rethink our analytic and therapeutic strategies Am J Transplant 4 1289-1295
[2]  
Schold JD(2001)Acute humoral rejection in renal allograft recipients: incidence, serology and clinical characteristics Transplantation 71 652-658
[3]  
Kaplan B(2002)Acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: II. Morphology, immunopathology, and pathologic classfication J Am Soc Nephrol 13 779-787
[4]  
Crespo M(1998)The prognostic significance of specific arterial lesions in acute renal allograft rejection J Am Soc Nephrol 9 1301-1308
[5]  
Pascual M(1992)The significance of the anti-class I response II clinical and pathological features of renal transplants with anti-class I-like antibody Transplantation 53 550-555
[6]  
Tolkoff-Rubin N(2003)The role of B cells and alloantibody in the host response to human organ allograft Immunol Rev 196 197-218
[7]  
Mauiyyedi S(2002)Capillary C4d deposition in kidney allografts: a specific marker of alloantibody-dependent graft injury J Am Soc Nephrol 13 1091-1099
[8]  
Fitzpatrick D(2003)Kidney transplants, antibodies and rejection: is C4d a magic marker? Nephrol Dial Transplant 18 2232-2239
[9]  
Farrell ML(2004)Role of MHC and non-MHC antibodies in graft rejection Curr Opin Organ Transplant 9 16-23
[10]  
Collins AB(2001)Classification of anti-endothelial cell antibodies into antibodies against microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cells Arthritis Rheum 44 1484-1494