Bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone with or without continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide for primary refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma: a randomized phase III study

被引:0
作者
Martin Kropff
Martin Vogel
Guido Bisping
Rudolf Schlag
Rudolf Weide
Wolfgang Knauf
Heinrich Fiechtner
Georgi Kojouharoff
Stephan Kremers
Wolfgang E. Berdel
机构
[1] University Hospital Muenster,Department of Medicine A
[2] Hematology,Department of Medicine III, Oncology
[3] and Stem Cell Transplantation,undefined
[4] Janssen-Cilag GmbH,undefined
[5] Private Practice for Hematology/Oncology,undefined
[6] Private Practice and Clinic for Hematology/Oncology,undefined
[7] Private Practice for Hematology and Oncology,undefined
[8] Private Practice for Hematology,undefined
[9] Oncology and Palliative Medicine,undefined
[10] Private Practice for Hematology/Oncology,undefined
[11] Center for Oncology,undefined
来源
Annals of Hematology | 2017年 / 96卷
关键词
Multiple myeloma; Phase III; Bortezomib; Cyclophosphamide; Relapsed/refractory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This phase III, open-label, randomized, controlled study aimed to evaluate the benefit of adding continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide to bortezomib-dexamethasone in patients with primary relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive up to eight 3-week cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (20 mg; VD; n = 48) or bortezomib-dexamethasone plus oral cyclophosphamide (50 mg; VCD; n = 48). Median time to progression (primary endpoint) was slightly longer in the VD versus VCD group (12.6 vs 9.9 months, P = 0.192), and the hazard ratio for disease progression was in favor of VD (hazard ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.43–1.19, P = 0.196). The overall response rate was 74% with VD and 70% with VCD. Most adverse events were similar in frequency between arms; however, grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy was more frequent in the VCD versus VD arm (15 vs 4%). Infection rate was higher in the VCD arm (64 vs 52%); however, grade ≥3 infection rates were comparable (19 vs 17%). Further trials are needed to determine whether addition of cyclophosphamide to VD at a different dose/schedule confers clinical benefit. This study was terminated prematurely, with insufficient sample size to adequately compare the arms; the results should, therefore, be considered descriptive. This trial is registered: EudraCT Number 2008-003213-27; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00813150.
引用
收藏
页码:1857 / 1866
页数:9
相关论文
共 572 条
  • [1] Baz RC(2016)Randomized multicenter phase 2 study of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in relapsed refractory myeloma Blood 127 2561-2568
  • [2] Martin TG(2006)Low dose Velcade, thalidomide and dexamethasone (LD-VTD): an effective regimen for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients Leuk Lymphoma 47 171-173
  • [3] Lin HY(2007)The combination of cyclophosphamide, velcade and dexamethasone induces high response rates with comparable toxicity to velcade alone and velcade plus dexamethasone Haematologica 92 1149-1150
  • [4] Zhao X(2013)Retrospective matched-pair analysis of the efficacy and safety of Bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus Bortezomib monotherapy in patients (pts) with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 121 3177-1272
  • [5] Shain KH(2013)Phase II study of bortezomib-dexamethasone alone or with added cyclophosphamide or lenalidomide for sub-optimal response as second-line treatment for patients with multiple myeloma Haematologica 98 1264-1473
  • [6] Cho HJ(2006)International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma Leukemia 20 1467-2482
  • [7] Wolf JL(2009)Velcade, intravenous cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) induction for previously untreated multiple myeloma (German DSMM XIa trial) Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 114 131-172
  • [8] Mahindra A(2012)Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone over the dual combination of thalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma progressing or relapsing after autologous transplantation: the MMVAR/IFM 2005-04 randomized phase III trial from the chronic leukemia working Party of the European Group for blood and marrow transplantation J Clin Oncol 30 2475-2840
  • [9] Chari A(2014)Therapeutic advancements in multiple myeloma Front Oncol 4 241-337
  • [10] Sullivan DM(2004)A phase 2 study of two doses of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory myeloma Br J Haematol 127 165-4382