Does the Hebrew Eating Assessment Tool-10 Correlate with Pharyngeal Residue, Penetration and Aspiration on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing?

被引:0
作者
Yael Shapira-Galitz
Ruth Yousovich
Doron Halperin
Michael Wolf
Yonatan Lahav
Michael Drendel
机构
[1] Affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem,The Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center
[2] Affiliated with the Tel Aviv University,The Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center
来源
Dysphagia | 2019年 / 34卷
关键词
Dysphagia; EAT-10; Patient-reported outcome measure; Questionnaire; Dysphagia screening; Aspiration; Pharyngeal residue; Deglutition; Deglutition disorders;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) is a 10-item patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for dysphagia patients. The objective of this study was to translate and validate the EAT-10Heb and to test for a correlation between its score and residue, penetration and aspiration on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES). 136 patients visiting two specialized dysphagia clinics and undergoing FEES between April 2015 and August 2017, filled the EAT-10Heb. 23 patients refilled the EAT-10Heb during a 2-week period following their first visit. FEES were scored for residue (1 point per consistency, maximum 3 points) and penetration and aspiration (1 point for penetration, 2 points for aspiration per consistency, maximum 6 points). 51 healthy volunteers also filled the EAT-10Heb. Internal consistency and test–retest reproducibility were examined for reliability testing. Validity was established by comparing EAT-10Heb scores of dysphagia patients to healthy controls. The EAT-10Heb score was then correlated with the FEES score. Internal consistency of the EAT-10Heb was high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.925) as was the test–retest reproducibility (Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.82, p < 0.0001). The median EAT-10Heb score was significantly higher in the dysphagia group compared to healthy controls (13, IQR 7–22 points for dysphagia patients compared to 0, IQR 0–0 points for healthy controls, p < 0.0001). A weak correlation was found between the EAT-10Heb scores and the FEES score (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.376, p < 0.0001). While the EAT-10Heb was found to be a reliable and valid PROM, it only weakly correlates with the pathological findings on FEES examination.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 381
页数:9
相关论文
共 192 条
[1]  
Lindgren S(1991)Prevalence of swallowing complaints and clinical findings among 50–79-year-old men and women in an urban population Dysphagia 6 187-192
[2]  
Janzon L(2007)The prevalence of dysphagia in primary care patients: a HamesNet Research Network study J Am Board Fam Med 20 144-150
[3]  
Wilkins T(2005)Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications Stroke 36 2756-2763
[4]  
Gillies RA(2011)Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia and impaired safety and efficacy of swallow in independently living older persons J Am Geriatr Soc 59 186-187
[5]  
Thomas AM(2013)Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a risk factor for readmission for pneumonia in the very elderly: observational prospective study J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 17 139–46-386
[6]  
Wagner PJ(2002)Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment Dysphagia 10 380-52
[7]  
Martino R(2000)Swallowing disorders following acute stroke: prevalence and diagnostic accuracy Cerebrovasc Dis 38 49-722
[8]  
Foley N(1997)Dysphagia in Parkinson’s disease Eur Neurol 300 721-717
[9]  
Bhogal S(1990)Prevalence of subjective dysphagia in community residents aged over 87 BMJ 26 710-778
[10]  
Diamant N(2007)Long- term prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: impact on quality of life Clin Nutr 61 772-198