Soil history affects plant growth and competitive ability in herbaceous species

被引:16
作者
Bonanomi G. [1 ]
Mazzoleni S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dipartimento di Arboricoltura Botanica e Patologia Vegetale, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli
关键词
Plant-soil negative feedback; RCI index; Soil history; Species interaction;
D O I
10.1556/ComEc.6.2005.1.3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Below ground soil characteristics are recognised as possible key factors in affecting plant species coexistence and community organisation. In this study, soil heterogeneity was generated by the growth of different herbaceous plants under controlled conditions, and thus related to growth and competitive ability of three naturally co-occurring species (Holcus lanatus, Inula viscosa and Pulicaria dysenterica). Soil changes induced by all species caused significant specific effects on the performance of these species and on their competitive hierarchies. Holcus lanatus was the strongest competitor on disturbed soil, but showed a dramatic negative feedback in monoculture. The experimental results are relevant for understanding community ecology and suggest that the investigation of species coexistence should take into account the possible role of plant-soil feedback processes. © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Armstrong J., Armstrong W., An overview of the effects of phytotoxins on Phragmites australis in relation to die-back, Aquatic Bot., 69, pp. 251-268, (2001)
[2]  
Belsky A.J., Influences of trees on savanna productivity: Tests of shade, nutrients, and tree-grass competition, Ecology, 75, pp. 922-932, (1994)
[3]  
Bever J., Feedback between plants ant their soil communities in an old field community, Ecology, 75, pp. 1965-1977, (1994)
[4]  
Bever J., Westover M., Antonovics J., Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: The utility of the feedback approach, J. Ecol., 85, pp. 561-573, (1997)
[5]  
Bever J., Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: Conceptual frameworks and empirical tests, New Phytol., 157, pp. 465-473, (2003)
[6]  
Blomqvist M.M., Olff H., Blaauw M.B., Bongers T., Van der Putten H., Interaction between above- and below ground biota: Importance of small scale vegetation mosaic in a grassland ecosystem, Oikos, 90, pp. 582-598, (2000)
[7]  
Buckland M.S., Thompson K., Hodgson G., Grime J.P., Grassland invasion: Effects of manipulations of climate and management, J. Applied Ecol., 38, pp. 301-309, (2001)
[8]  
Chapin III F.S., Walker L.R., Fastie C.L., Sharman L.C., Mechanism of primary succession following deglaciation at glacier bay, Alaska, Ecol. Monogr., 64, pp. 149-175, (1994)
[9]  
Crick J.C., Grime P.J., Morphological plasticity and mineral nutrient capture in two herbaceous species of contrasted ecology, New Phytol., 107, pp. 403-414, (1987)
[10]  
Diaz S., Symstad J., Chapin III S., Wardle D., Huenneke F., Functional diversity revealed by removal experiments, Trends Ecol. Evol., 18, pp. 140-146, (2003)