Methods for determining cost-benefit ratios for pharmaceuticals in Germany

被引:0
作者
J.- Matthias Graf v. d. Schulenburg
Christoph Vauth
Thomas Mittendorf
Wolfgang Greiner
机构
[1] Leibniz University Hanover,School of Economics and Management, Centre for Health Economics and Health System Research
[2] University of Bielefeld,Department of Public Health, Chair for Health Economics and Health Care Management
来源
The European Journal of Health Economics | 2007年 / 8卷
关键词
Statutory Health Insurance; Health Economic Evaluation; External Expert; Health Insurance Fund; Budget Impact Analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this methodological paper is to summarize evidence on how to implement cost-benefit assessment according to the new German legislative framework (Competition Enhancement Act). Given the complexity of existing health policy frameworks within industrialised countries in adapting health economics in their respective regulatory scheme, no clear international scientific consensus on which health economic methods should be chosen for assessment can be determined. Nevertheless, a broad consensus on the internal properties of methods itself can be found. Based on these common international standards in methodology, this work provides a minimum catalogue of methods and criteria that meet legal and local German requirements with regard to specific factors of its health care system. Aside from categorising clearly defined standards (e.g., study forms, cost and benefit categories) the suggested catalogue specifies some intensively debated areas in Germany (e.g., the QALY, modelling, the perspective used in the assessment). After the proposition of certain methods the paper leads to a first recommendation of a detailed assessment-process itself specific for the German way in implementing cost-benefit ratios within regulatory decision making in Germany.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 31
页数:26
相关论文
共 170 条
  • [1] Akehurst R.(2000)Decision analytic modelling in the economic evaluation of health technologies. A consensus statement Pharmacoeconomics 17 443-444
  • [2] Anderson P.(2006)Cost-of-illness studies: a review of current methods Pharmacoeconomics 24 869-890
  • [3] Brazier J.E.(1997)Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review J. Health Econ. 16 685-702
  • [4] Akobundu E.(2000)The value of DALY life: problems with ethics and validity of disability adjusted life years Lepr. Rev. 71 123-127
  • [5] Ju J.(1996)Opening the debate on DALYs (disability-adjusted life years) Health Policy Plan. 11 179-183
  • [6] Blatt L.(2004)Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 9 110-118
  • [7] Mullins C.D.(2004)Estimating a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) instrument from the SF-6D Value Health 7 490-498
  • [8] Anand S.(2006)The importance of patient-reported outcomes...it’s all about the patients FDA Consum. 40 26-32
  • [9] Hanson K.(2005)Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: statistical representation of parameter uncertainty Value Health 8 1-2
  • [10] Arnesen T.(1998)An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation Pharmacoeconomics 13 397-409