Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases

被引:0
作者
A. Sharma
P. Dahiya
R. Khullar
V. Soni
M. Baijal
P. K. Chowbey
机构
[1] Max Healthcare Institute Ltd.,Institute of Minimal Access, Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery
来源
Indian Journal of Surgery | 2012年 / 74卷
关键词
Cholecystectomy; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery; SILS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for gallbladder removal and the most common laparoscopic procedure worldwide. With the advent of laparoscopic surgery and its continuous development, the focus has shifted to ‘scarless’ surgery. In recent times, the innovative technique of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been applied in gallbladder removal and even more complex biliopancreatic procedures to further minimize the invasiveness of the surgery. Newer developments in laparoscopic equipments and instrumentation have helped to further evolve this field of minimally invasive surgery. Literature search was performed using the following online search engines: Google, Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, and the online Springer link library. The terms used for the search were as follows: SILS, LESS, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, single-port laparoscopic surgery, SILS cholecystectomy, and SILS pancreatic surgery. Articles that matched the search criteria were selected and extensively reviewed. Moreover, pertinent information on instrumentation and technology for SILS and LESS was obtained by accessing websites of manufacturers. Although SILS represents the search for an essentially scarless surgery, there is still not a widespread use and uniformity of this procedure. SILS is performed either by single- or multiple-port technique. In the present article, we present a review of the potential benefits, limitations, and risks of SILS in biliary and pancreatic diseases. There are many studies showing benefits in cholecystectomy. A few case reports have also emerged about its feasibility in procedures such as cystogastrostomy and limited pancreatic resection. Further research and development of this technique is needed to arrive at a tangible conclusion about the perceived benefits of SILS. Randomized studies to compare SILS with traditional laparoscopy are essential.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:8
相关论文
共 149 条
[1]  
McGregor CG(2011)Evaluating systemic stress response in single port vs. multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Gastrointest Surg 15 614-622
[2]  
Sodergren MH(1998)Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response Ann Surg 227 326-334
[3]  
Aslanyan A(2009)A comprehensive review of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy J Gastrointest Surg 13 1733-1740
[4]  
Wright VJ(1995)General stress response to conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy Ann Surg 221 372-380
[5]  
Purkayastha S(2009)Systematic review: open, small-incision or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis Aliment Pharmacol Ther 29 359-378
[6]  
Darzi A(1997)History of endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery World J Surg 21 444-453
[7]  
Paraskeva P(2004)The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy Langenbecks Arch Surg 389 157-163
[8]  
Vittimberga FJ(1986)Die erste: cholecystecktomie durch das laparoskop (The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy) Langenbecks Arch Surg 369 804-492
[9]  
Foley DP(2001)History of laparoscopy Surg Oncol Clin N Am 10 483-117
[10]  
Meyers WC(2004)Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity Gastrointest Endosc 60 114-826