Schumpeterian growth and the political economy of employment protection

被引:0
作者
Wolf-Heimo Grieben
机构
[1] University of Dortmund,Department of Economics
关键词
Non-Scale Growth; Schumpeterian Unemployment; Firing Costs; J63; O33; E24; D72;
D O I
10.1007/BF03051801
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper analyzes the differing attitudes concerning political support for employment protection between skilled and unskilled workers in a quality-ladder growth model. Creative destruction through innovation results in “Schumpeterian unemployment” of unskilled workers. By voting on firing costs, unskilled workers consider a trade-off between the benefit of fewer unemployment spells and the cost of lower quality growth of consumer goods. Skilled workers, although not threatened by unemployment, may vote for even larger firing costs. Alleviating one labor market rigidity by increasing the matching efficiency between firms and unskilled workers aggravates another rigidity by creating political support for additional firing costs.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 118
页数:41
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Aghion P.(2001)Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation Review of Economic Studies 68 467-492
[2]  
Harris C.(1992)A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction Econometrica 60 323-351
[3]  
Howitt P.(1994)Growth and Unemployment Review of Economic Studies 61 477-494
[4]  
Vickers J.(2002)On the Growth Effects of North-South Trade: the Role of Labor Market Flexibility Journal of International Economics 58 451-466
[5]  
Aghion P.(1999)A Schumpeterian Model of Protection and Relative Wages American Economic Review 89 450-472
[6]  
Howitt P.(1996)A Contribution to the Empirics of Endogenous Growth Eastern Economic Journal 22 389-400
[7]  
Aghion P.(2004)Innovation by Leaders Economic Journal 114 281-303
[8]  
Howitt P.(1991)Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth Review of Economic Studies 58 43-61
[9]  
Arnold L. G.(2003)The Survival of the Welfare State American Economic Review 93 87-112
[10]  
Dinopoulos E.(1995)R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth Journal of Political Economy 103 759-784