Cone-beam computed tomography or conventional radiography for localising of maxillary impacted canines?Question: In patients with maxillary impacted canines is there a difference in the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography?

被引：6
作者：
Niloufar Amintavakoli
Silvia Spivakovsky
机构：
[1] New York University College of Dentistry,
来源：
Evidence-Based Dentistry | 2018年 / 19卷 / 1期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1038/sj.ebd.6401291
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：22 / 23
页数：1
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Pico CL(2017)Comparative analysis of impacted upper canines: Panoramic radiograph Vs Cone Beam Computed Tomography J Clin Exp Dent 9 e1176-82
[2]  
do Vale FJ(2014)Localization of impacted maxillary canines and root resorption of neighbouring teeth: a study assessing the diagnostic value of panoramic radiographs in two groups of observers Eur J Orthod 36 450-456
[3]  
Caramelo FJ(2009)Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer Arch Intern Med 169 2078-2086
[4]  
Corte-Real A(2015)Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44 20140197-undefined
[5]  
Pereira SM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[6]  
Lai CS(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[7]  
Suter VG(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[8]  
Katsaros C(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Bornstein MM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Smith-Bindman R(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
12