Political connections and voluntary disclosure: the case of Canadian listed companies

被引:0
作者
Saidatou Dicko
Hanen Khemakhem
Félix Zogning
机构
[1] Université du Québec à Montréal,
[2] Université du Québec en Outaouais,undefined
来源
Journal of Management and Governance | 2020年 / 24卷
关键词
Political connections; Board of directors; Top management; Voluntary disclosure; Environmental disclosure; Social disclosure; Corporate governance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Business and politics are now more connected than ever. In Canada, more than 50% of listed companies have political connections through the board of directors or top management. These ties can give companies the resources they need to achieve their goals and possibly even confer a substantial advantage that results in better financial performance. To this end, political connections must influence the various choices and behaviours of politically connected companies, such as their voluntary disclosure strategy. As this type of influence has rarely been investigated in the literature, the current study looks at the impact of board and top management political connections on the voluntary disclosure behaviour of Canadian firms. Four types of voluntary disclosure—environmental, social, governance and total—are analyzed. Results show that politically connected companies make broader voluntary disclosures than non-connected firms do. Board and top management political connections are positively and significantly related to total voluntary disclosure, and board political connections are positively and significantly related to governance disclosures. In addition, top management political connections are positively and significantly related to voluntary environmental and social disclosures. This study is the first to shed light on the link between political connections and the voluntary disclosure of Canadian listed companies, as well as the first to confirm that not all political connections are equal. The impact of these connections on companies’ choices and behaviours can differs according to the politically connected actor’s position in the company, including on the board of directors or in top management. This difference could be explained by the fact that while board are generally concerned about strategic issues, top management deal with operational aspects. Consequently, they may not have the same behaviours and choices.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 506
页数:25
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
Aboody D(2000)CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 73-100
[2]  
Kasznik R(2007)The association between web-based corporate performance disclosure and financial analyst behaviour under different governance regimes Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 1301-1329
[3]  
Aerts W(1996)Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders Journal ofFinancial and Quantitative Analysis 31 377-397
[4]  
Cormier D(2013)Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies Journal of Management and Governance 17 187-216
[5]  
Magnan M(2018)Role of country-and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure Journal of Business Ethics 150 79-98
[6]  
Agrawal A(2008)Corporate social reporting and board representation: Evidence from the Kenyan banking sector Journal of Management and Governance 12 309-125
[7]  
Knoeber C(2006)Factors influencing voluntary disclosure by Kenyan companies Corporate Governance 14 107-31
[8]  
Allegrini M(2018)Environmental, social and governance disclosure, integrated reporting, and the accuracy of analyst forecasts The British Accounting Review 50 16-349
[9]  
Greco G(1997)Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital The Accounting Review 72 323-559
[10]  
Baldini M(2012)Political connections and the cost of equity capital Journal of Corporate Finance 18 541-132