A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy

被引:0
作者
Andrea Polonioli
机构
[1] University of Birmingham,Department of Philosophy
来源
Synthese | 2019年 / 196卷
关键词
Cognitive bias; Heuristics; Naturalism; Systematic review; Narrative review; Methodology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Naturalistic philosophers rely on literature search and review in a number of ways and for different purposes. Yet this article shows how processes of literature search and review are likely to be affected by widespread and systematic biases. A solution to this problem is offered here. Whilst the tradition of systematic reviews of literature from scientific disciplines has been neglected in philosophy, systematic reviews are important tools that minimize bias in literature search and review and allow for greater reproducibility and transparency. If naturalistic philosophers wish to reduce bias in their research, they should then supplement their traditional tools for literature search and review by including systematic methodologies.
引用
收藏
页码:3841 / 3867
页数:26
相关论文
共 253 条
[1]  
Andow J(2016)Thin, fine and with sensitivity: a metamethodology of intuitions Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 105-125
[2]  
Arkes HR(2016)How bad is incoherence? Decision 3 20-39
[3]  
Gigerenzer G(2010)Assessing the merits and faults of holistic and disaggregated judgments Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 23 250-270
[4]  
Hertwig R(2006)Comparing holistic and disaggregated ratings in the evaluation of scientific presentations Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19 429-439
[5]  
Arkes HR(2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility Nature 533 452-454
[6]  
Gonzalez-Vallejo C(1998)Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model American Sociological Review 63 829-846
[7]  
Bonham AJ(1997)Writing narrative literature reviews Review of general psychology 1 311-268
[8]  
Kung Y-H(2009)Prosocial benefits of feeling free: Disbelief in free will increases aggression and reduces helpfulness Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35 260-103
[9]  
Bailey N(2002)Why good accountants do bad audits Harvard Business Review 80 96-166
[10]  
Arkes HR(2010)As-if behavioral economics: Neoclassical economics in disguise? History of Economic Ideas 18 133-39