Association of industry sponsorship and positive outcome in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: Protocol for a systematic review and empirical study

被引:4
作者
Probst P. [1 ,2 ]
Grummich K. [2 ]
Ulrich A. [1 ]
Büchler M.W. [1 ]
Knebel P. [1 ,2 ]
Diener M.K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg
[2] The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg
关键词
General and abdominal surgery; Health care research; Industry bias; Industry sponsorship; Medical devices; Randomised controlled trial; Science study; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1186/2046-4053-3-138
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Industry sponsorship has been identified as a factor correlating with positive research findings in several fields of medical science. To date, the influence of industry sponsorship in general and abdominal surgery has not been fully studied. This protocol describes the rationale and planned conduct of a systematic review to determine the association between industry sponsorship and positive outcome in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery. Methods/Design: A literature search in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE and additional hand searches in relevant citations will be conducted. In order to cover all relevant areas of general and abdominal surgery, a new literature search strategy called multi-PICO search strategy (MPSS) has been developed. No language restriction will be applied. The search will be limited to publications between January 1985 and July 2014. Information on funding source, outcome, study characteristics and methodological quality will be extracted. The association between industry sponsorship and positive outcome will be tested by a chi-squared test. A multivariate logistic regression analysis will be performed to control for possible confounders, such as number of study centres, multinational trials, methodological quality, journal impact factor and sample size. Discussion: This study was designed to clarify whether industry-sponsored trials report more positive outcomes than non-industry trials. It will be the first study to evaluate this topic in general and abdominal surgery. The findings of this study will enable surgical societies, in particular, to give advice about cooperation with the industry and disclosure of funding source based on empirical evidence. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42014010802. © 2014 Probst et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Non-Pharmacological Sleep Interventions after Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Lee, Sueyeon
    Chen, Pei
    Park, Chang
    Zhu, Bingqian
    Balserak, Bilgay I.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024,
  • [42] Effectiveness of web-based interventions for women with urinary incontinence: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Xu, Xuefen
    Guo, Pingping
    Xu, Ping
    Chen, Dan Dan
    Chen, Weijing
    Wang, Hongyan
    Jin, Ying
    Wang, Xiaojuan
    Zhang, Wei
    Xie, Fang
    Mao, Minna
    Zhao, Rujia
    Feng, Suwen
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [43] Herbal medicine (Hyeolbuchukeo-tang or Xuefu Zhuyu decoction) for treating primary dysmenorrhoea: protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Jo, Junyoung
    Leem, Jungtae
    Lee, Jin Moo
    Park, Kyoung Sun
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (06):
  • [44] A core outcome set for clinical trials of Chinese medicine for hyperlipidemia: a study protocol for a systematic review and a Delphi survey
    Li, Geng
    Zhou, Li
    Ouyang, Wenwei
    Xuan, Meiling
    Lu, Liming
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Wen, Zehuai
    Chen, Xiankun
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [45] A core outcome set for clinical trials of Chinese medicine for hyperlipidemia: a study protocol for a systematic review and a Delphi survey
    Geng Li
    Li Zhou
    Wenwei Ouyang
    Meiling Xuan
    Liming Lu
    Xiaoyan Li
    Zehuai Wen
    Xiankun Chen
    Trials, 20
  • [46] Effectiveness of strategies for nutritional therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes and/or hypertension in primary care: protocol of a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Correa Galendi, Julia Simoes
    Occhiuto Ferreira Leite, Renata Giacomini
    Mendes, Adriana Lucia
    Nunes-Nogueira, Vania dos Santos
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (09):
  • [47] Interventions for promoting evidence-based guideline-consistent surgery in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Belavy, Daniel L.
    Tagliaferri, Scott D.
    Buntine, Paul
    Saueressig, Tobias
    Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja
    Chen, Xiaolong
    Diwan, Ashish
    Miller, Clint T.
    Owen, Patrick J.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 31 (11) : 2851 - 2865
  • [48] Interventions for promoting evidence-based guideline-consistent surgery in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Daniel L. Belavy
    Scott D. Tagliaferri
    Paul Buntine
    Tobias Saueressig
    Katja Ehrenbrusthoff
    Xiaolong Chen
    Ashish Diwan
    Clint T. Miller
    Patrick J. Owen
    European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 2851 - 2865
  • [49] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction of general anaesthesia or sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Saeed, Abdallah
    Elewidi, Mariam
    Nawlo, Ahmad
    Elzahaby, Amr
    Khaled, Asmaa
    Othman, Abdalla
    Abuelazm, Mohamed
    Abdelazeem, Basel
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (09) : 776 - 794
  • [50] Association of incident dialysis modality with mortality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies
    Mark R. Marshall
    Chun-Yuan Hsiao
    Philip K. Li
    Masaaki Nakayama
    S. Rabindranath
    Rachael C. Walker
    Xueqing Yu
    Suetonia C. Palmer
    Systematic Reviews, 8