Association of industry sponsorship and positive outcome in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: Protocol for a systematic review and empirical study

被引:4
作者
Probst P. [1 ,2 ]
Grummich K. [2 ]
Ulrich A. [1 ]
Büchler M.W. [1 ]
Knebel P. [1 ,2 ]
Diener M.K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg
[2] The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg
关键词
General and abdominal surgery; Health care research; Industry bias; Industry sponsorship; Medical devices; Randomised controlled trial; Science study; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1186/2046-4053-3-138
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Industry sponsorship has been identified as a factor correlating with positive research findings in several fields of medical science. To date, the influence of industry sponsorship in general and abdominal surgery has not been fully studied. This protocol describes the rationale and planned conduct of a systematic review to determine the association between industry sponsorship and positive outcome in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery. Methods/Design: A literature search in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE and additional hand searches in relevant citations will be conducted. In order to cover all relevant areas of general and abdominal surgery, a new literature search strategy called multi-PICO search strategy (MPSS) has been developed. No language restriction will be applied. The search will be limited to publications between January 1985 and July 2014. Information on funding source, outcome, study characteristics and methodological quality will be extracted. The association between industry sponsorship and positive outcome will be tested by a chi-squared test. A multivariate logistic regression analysis will be performed to control for possible confounders, such as number of study centres, multinational trials, methodological quality, journal impact factor and sample size. Discussion: This study was designed to clarify whether industry-sponsored trials report more positive outcomes than non-industry trials. It will be the first study to evaluate this topic in general and abdominal surgery. The findings of this study will enable surgical societies, in particular, to give advice about cooperation with the industry and disclosure of funding source based on empirical evidence. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42014010802. © 2014 Probst et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review
    Hall, Nigel J.
    Kapadia, Mufiza Z.
    Eaton, Simon
    Chan, Winnie W. Y.
    Nickel, Cheri
    Pierro, Agostino
    Offringa, Martin
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [22] The influence of study characteristics on reporting of subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: systematic review
    Sun, Xin
    Briel, Matthias
    Busse, Jason W.
    You, John J.
    Akl, Elie A.
    Mejza, Filip
    Bala, Malgorzata M.
    Bassler, Dirk
    Mertz, Dominik
    Diaz-Granados, Natalia
    Vandvik, Per Olav
    Malaga, German
    Srinathan, Sadeesh K.
    Dahm, Philipp
    Johnston, Bradley C.
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Hassouneh, Basil
    Truong, Jessica
    Dattani, Neil D.
    Walter, Stephen D.
    Heels-Ansdell, Diane
    Bhatnagar, Neera
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342 : 748
  • [23] Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review
    Nigel J. Hall
    Mufiza Z. Kapadia
    Simon Eaton
    Winnie W. Y. Chan
    Cheri Nickel
    Agostino Pierro
    Martin Offringa
    Trials, 16
  • [24] The effectiveness of general physical exercise for individuals with chronic neck pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    de Zoete, Rutger M. J.
    Brown, Lauren
    Oliveira, Katie
    Penglaze, Liam
    Rex, Rachelle
    Sawtell, Bronte
    Sullivan, Tegan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2020, 22 (03) : 141 - 147
  • [26] Effectiveness of physical activity promotion and exercise referral in primary care: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Jean-Pierre Laake
    Joanna Fleming
    Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [27] Effectiveness of online interventions in preventing depression: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Rigabert, Alina
    Motrico, Emma
    Moreno-Peral, Patricia
    Resurreccion, Davinia M.
    Conejo-Ceron, Sonia
    Navas-Campana, Desiree
    Bellon, Juan A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (11):
  • [28] How often are outcomes other than change in substance use measured? A systematic review of outcome measures in contemporary randomised controlled trials
    Bjornestad, Jone
    McKay, James R.
    Berg, Henrik
    Moltu, Christian
    Nesvag, Sverre
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2020, 39 (04) : 394 - 414
  • [29] Selective outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials including participants with stroke or transient ischaemic attack: A systematic review
    Syed, Mohshin
    Martin, Helena
    Sena, Emily S.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Salman, Rustam Al-Shahi
    EUROPEAN STROKE JOURNAL, 2023, 8 (04) : 923 - 931
  • [30] Effectiveness of Prehabilitation Modalities on Postoperative Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Steffens, Daniel
    Nott, Finley
    Koh, Cherry
    Jiang, Wilson
    Hirst, Nicholas
    Cole, Ruby
    Karunaratne, Sascha
    West, Malcolm A.
    Jack, Sandy
    Solomon, Michael J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (12) : 7822 - 7849