Association of industry sponsorship and positive outcome in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: Protocol for a systematic review and empirical study

被引:4
作者
Probst P. [1 ,2 ]
Grummich K. [2 ]
Ulrich A. [1 ]
Büchler M.W. [1 ]
Knebel P. [1 ,2 ]
Diener M.K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg
[2] The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg
关键词
General and abdominal surgery; Health care research; Industry bias; Industry sponsorship; Medical devices; Randomised controlled trial; Science study; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1186/2046-4053-3-138
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Industry sponsorship has been identified as a factor correlating with positive research findings in several fields of medical science. To date, the influence of industry sponsorship in general and abdominal surgery has not been fully studied. This protocol describes the rationale and planned conduct of a systematic review to determine the association between industry sponsorship and positive outcome in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery. Methods/Design: A literature search in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE and additional hand searches in relevant citations will be conducted. In order to cover all relevant areas of general and abdominal surgery, a new literature search strategy called multi-PICO search strategy (MPSS) has been developed. No language restriction will be applied. The search will be limited to publications between January 1985 and July 2014. Information on funding source, outcome, study characteristics and methodological quality will be extracted. The association between industry sponsorship and positive outcome will be tested by a chi-squared test. A multivariate logistic regression analysis will be performed to control for possible confounders, such as number of study centres, multinational trials, methodological quality, journal impact factor and sample size. Discussion: This study was designed to clarify whether industry-sponsored trials report more positive outcomes than non-industry trials. It will be the first study to evaluate this topic in general and abdominal surgery. The findings of this study will enable surgical societies, in particular, to give advice about cooperation with the industry and disclosure of funding source based on empirical evidence. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42014010802. © 2014 Probst et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Industry Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in General and Abdominal Surgery An Empirical Study
    Probst, Pascal
    Knebel, Phillip
    Grummich, Kathrin
    Tenckhoff, Solveig
    Ulrich, Alexis
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Diener, Markus K.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 264 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [2] Blinding in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: Protocol for a systematic review and empirical study
    Probst P.
    Grummich K.
    Heger P.
    Zaschke S.
    Knebel P.
    Ulrich A.
    Büchler M.W.
    Diener M.K.
    Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [3] Laparoscopic versus robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Kawka, Michal
    Fong, Yuman
    Gall, Tamara M. H.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (09): : 6672 - 6681
  • [4] Laparoscopic versus robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Michal Kawka
    Yuman Fong
    Tamara M. H. Gall
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 6672 - 6681
  • [5] Factors associated with recruitment to randomised controlled trials in general practice: protocol for a systematic review
    Keith R. Moffat
    Paul Cannon
    Wen Shi
    Frank Sullivan
    Trials, 20
  • [6] Factors associated with recruitment to randomised controlled trials in general practice: protocol for a systematic review
    Moffat, Keith R.
    Cannon, Paul
    Shi, Wen
    Sullivan, Frank
    TRIALS, 2019, 20
  • [7] Electroacupuncture for abdominal obesity: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Lu, Qiuling
    Xu, Mindong
    Zhang, Lida
    Gao, Li
    Mao, Wei
    Han, Wei
    Xu, Nenggui
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [8] Cataract surgery and IOP: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Brizido, Margarida
    Rodrigues, Pedro Filipe
    Almeida, Ana C.
    Pinto, Luis Abegao
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 261 (05) : 1257 - 1266
  • [9] Cataract surgery and IOP: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Margarida Brízido
    Pedro Filipe Rodrigues
    Ana C. Almeida
    Luís Abegão Pinto
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2023, 261 : 1257 - 1266
  • [10] Use of Salivary Diurnal Cortisol as an Outcome Measure in Randomised Controlled Trials: a Systematic Review
    Ryan, Richella
    Booth, Sara
    Spathis, Anna
    Mollart, Sarah
    Clow, Angela
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 50 (02) : 210 - 236