High-dose CEB vs BEAM with autologous stem cell transplant in lymphoma

被引:0
作者
E H Wang
Y A Chen
S Corringham
A Bashey
P Holman
E D Ball
E Carrier
机构
[1] Cancer Center,
[2] University of California,undefined
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2004年 / 34卷
关键词
lymphoma; chemotherapy; autologous;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Between January 1996 and July 2002, 72 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's disease underwent high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant conditioned with either cyclophosphamide, etoposide, carmustine (CEB) or carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM) at a single institution. In all, 52 patients received CEB and 20 patients received the BEAM regimen. Patient characteristics that were significantly different between the two groups are tumor grade and extranodal involvement (P=0.0196, 0.0341, respectively). Regimen-related toxicities examined yielded only diarrhea occurring at a higher rate in the BEAM group (81 vs 51%, P=0.0026), although cases were milder (92 vs 57%). Patients treated with CEB developed mucositis at a slightly higher rate (79%) than patients treated with BEAM (75%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. However, the mucositis that occurred within the BEAM group was predominately mild (67%) in contrast to the predominance of moderate to severe cases in the CEB group (74%). In addition, patients treated with CEB required growth factor support for a longer time than patients treated with BEAM (P=0.0399). Response rates were high in both groups, with trends favoring the BEAM group. Overall survival was higher after treatment with BEAM than with CEB (84 vs 60%).
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 587
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Alessandrino EP(2000)Pulmonary toxicity following carmustine-based preparative regimens and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in hematological malignancies Bone Marrow Transplant 25 309-313
[2]  
Bernasconi P(1993)High-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide and BCNU (CVB) with autologous stem cell rescue in malignant lymphomas Eur J Haematol 51 18-24
[3]  
Colombo A(1991)Intensive chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation for relapsed Hodgkin's disease J Clin Oncol 9 1871-1879
[4]  
Patti C(1999)Regimen-related toxicity and non-relapse mortality with high-dose cyclophosphamide, carmustine (BCNU) and etoposide (VP16-213) (CBV) and CBV plus cisplatin (CBVP) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with Hodgkin's disease Bone Marrow Transplant 23 1131-1138
[5]  
Majolino I(1993)High-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell rescue in patients with relapsed Hodgkin's disease Ann Hematol 66 251-656
[6]  
Scime R(1990)Cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation in refractory Hodgkin's disease and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a dose-finding study J Clin Oncol 8 648-672
[7]  
Reece DE(2000)High-dose BEAM chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood-progenitor-cell transplantation for unselected patients with primary refractory or relapsed Hodgkin's disease Ann Oncol 11 665-98
[8]  
Barnett MJ(1999)Protracted results of dose-intensive therapy using cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and continuous infusion etoposide with autologous stem cell support in patients with relapse or refractory Hodgkin's disease: a phase II study from the North American Marrow Transplant Group Leuk Lymphoma 35 91-595
[9]  
Conners JM(1995)BEAM chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma J Clin Oncol 13 588-156
[10]  
Reece DE(1996)High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic rescue for Hodgkin's disease patients following first relapse after chemotherapy Ann Oncol 7 151-1145