Comparing Cerebellar tDCS and Cerebellar tACS in Neurodegenerative Ataxias Using Wearable Sensors: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Triple-Crossover Trial

被引:0
作者
Ilenia Libri
Valentina Cantoni
Alberto Benussi
Jasmine Rivolta
Camilla Ferrari
Roberto Fancellu
Matthis Synofzik
Antonella Alberici
Alessandro Padovani
Barbara Borroni
机构
[1] University of Brescia,Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences
[2] ASST Spedali Civili,Neurology Unit, Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences
[3] University of Florence,Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA)
[4] IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino,UO Neurologia
[5] Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Centre of Neurology,Department of Neurodegeneration
[6] German Research Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE),undefined
来源
The Cerebellum | 2024年 / 23卷
关键词
cerebellar Ataxia; Transcranial direct current Stimulation; Transcranial alternating current stimulation; Wearable sensors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) represents a promising therapeutic approach for both motor and cognitive symptoms in neurodegenerative ataxias. Recently, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was also demonstrated to modulate cerebellar excitability by neuronal entrainment. To compare the effectiveness of cerebellar tDCS vs. cerebellar tACS in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia, we performed a double-blind, randomized, sham controlled, triple cross-over trial with cerebellar tDCS, cerebellar tACS or sham stimulation in twenty-six participants with neurodegenerative ataxia. Before entering the study, each participant underwent motor assessment with wearable sensors considering gait cadence (steps/minute), turn velocity (degrees/second) and turn duration (seconds), and a clinical evaluation with the scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). After each intervention, participants underwent the same clinical assessment along with cerebellar inhibition (CBI) measurement, a marker of cerebellar activity. The gait cadence, turn velocity, SARA, and ICARS significantly improved after both tDCS and tACS, compared to sham stimulation (all p<0.010). Comparable effects were observed for CBI (p<0.001). Overall, tDCS significantly outperformed tACS on clinical scales and CBI (p<0.01). A significant correlation between changes of wearable sensors parameters from baseline and changes of clinical scales and CBI scores was detected. Cerebellar tDCS and cerebellar tACS are effective in ameliorating symptoms of neurodegenerative ataxias, with the former being more beneficial than the latter. Wearable sensors may serve as rater-unbiased outcome measures in future clinical trials. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT05621200.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 578
页数:8
相关论文
共 227 条
  • [1] Benussi A(2017)Long term clinical and neurophysiological effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia Brain Stimul. 10 242-250
  • [2] Dell’Era V(2018)Cerebello-spinal tDCS in ataxia: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover trial Neurology. 91 e1090-e1101
  • [3] Cotelli MS(2015)Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with ataxia: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study Mov Disord. 30 1701-1705
  • [4] Turla M(2021)Motor and cognitive outcomes of cerebello-spinal stimulation in neurodegenerative ataxia Brain. 144 2310-2321
  • [5] Casali C(2021)Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines Clin Neurophysiol. 132 269-306
  • [6] Padovani A(2021)The efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cerebellum. 20 124-133
  • [7] Benussi A(2017)Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines Clin Neurophysiol. 128 1774-1809
  • [8] Dell’Era V(2009)Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation J Neurosci. 29 9115-9122
  • [9] Cantoni V(2016)Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS): a novel approach to understanding cerebellar function in health and disease Neuroscientist. 22 83-97
  • [10] Bonetta E(2005)Intracerebral study of gamma rhythm reactivity in the sensorimotor cortex Eur J Neurosci. 21 1223-1235