European guidelines for personality disorders: past, present and future

被引:0
作者
Sebastian Simonsen
Anthony Bateman
Martin Bohus
Henk Jan Dalewijk
Stephan Doering
Andres Kaera
Paul Moran
Babette Renneberg
Joaquim Soler Ribaudi
Svenja Taubner
Theresa Wilberg
Lars Mehlum
机构
[1] Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre,University College, London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families
[2] University of Copenhagen,Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy; Central Institute of Mental Health
[3] Heidelberg University,Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy
[4] Private practice,Centre for Academic Mental Health, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School
[5] Medical University of Vienna,Department of Research and Development, Division of Mental Health and Addiction
[6] Kanta-Häme Central Hospital,National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Institute of Clinical Medicine
[7] University of Bristol,undefined
[8] Freie Universität,undefined
[9] Department of Psychiatry,undefined
[10] Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau,undefined
[11] Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental,undefined
[12] CIBERSAM,undefined
[13] Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg | Universität Heidelberg,undefined
[14] Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine,undefined
[15] University of Oslo,undefined
[16] University of Oslo,undefined
来源
Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation | / 6卷
关键词
Guidelines; Personality disorders; Recommendations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Personality disorders (PD) are common and burdensome mental disorders. The treatment of individuals with PD represents one of the more challenging areas in the field of mental health and health care providers need evidence-based recommendations to best support patients with PDs. Clinical guidelines serve this purpose and are formulated by expert consensus and/or systematic reviews of the current evidence. In this review, European guidelines for the treatment of PDs are summarized and evaluated. To date, eight countries in Europe have developed and published guidelines that differ in quality with regard to recency and completeness, transparency of methods, combination of expert knowledge with empirical data, and patient/service user involvement. Five of the guidelines are about Borderline personality disorder (BPD), one is about antisocial personality disorder and three concern PD in general. After evaluating the methodological quality of the nine European guidelines from eight countries, results in the domains of diagnosis, psychotherapy and pharmacological treatment of PD are discussed. Our comparison of guidelines reveals important contradictions between recommendations in relation to diagnosis, length and setting of treatment, as well as the use of pharmacological treatment. All the guidelines recommend psychotherapy as the treatment of first choice. Future guidelines should rigorously follow internationally accepted methodology and should more systematically include the views of patients and users.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Fok ML-Y(2012)Life expectancy at birth and all-cause mortality among people with personality disorder J Psychosom Res 73 104-107
[2]  
Cramer V(2006)Personality disorders and quality of life. A population study Compr Psychiatry 47 178-184
[3]  
Torgersen S(1999)Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines Bmj 318 527-530
[4]  
Kringlen E(2012)Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations Implement Sci 7 61-E842
[5]  
Woolf SH(2010)AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care Can Med Assoc J 182 E839-873
[6]  
Woolf S(1994)Guidelines you can follow and can trust: an ideal and an example Jama 271 872-861
[7]  
Brouwers MC(1998)Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study Bmj 317 858-531
[8]  
McDonald CJ(2012)Guidelines international Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines Ann Intern Med 156 525-237
[9]  
Overhage JM(2014)Are recommendations for psychological treatment of borderline personality disorder in current UK guidelines justified? Systematic review and subgroup analysis Personal Ment Health 8 228-143
[10]  
Grol R(2018)Results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of schema therapy for personality disorders Psychiatr Psychother 169 135-322