Campaign resources and electoral success: Evidence from the 2002 French parliamentary elections

被引:0
作者
Gil S. Epstein
Raphaël Franck
机构
[1] Bar Ilan University,Department of Economics
[2] IZA,undefined
[3] CReAM,undefined
来源
Public Choice | 2007年 / 131卷
关键词
Campaign resources; Elections; Donations; France;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the factors that improve the candidates’ likelihood of winning an election by drawing on information from campaign resources used by candidates running in the 2002 French parliamentary election. The main effects that we wish to analyze are the candidates’ gender, political affiliation and possible incumbency. We find that the contributions the candidates received and their political affiliations determine their acceding to the second round of the elections. But surprisingly once they make it to the second round, the contributions cease to be relevant; only the candidates’ gender, incumbency and the actual spending rather than the contribution levels matter.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 489
页数:20
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Abrams B.A.(2004)Campaign-finance reform: A public choice perspective Public Choice 120 379-400
[2]  
Settle R.F.(1976)The effect of broadcasting on political campaign spending Journal of Political Economy 84 1095-1107
[3]  
Abrams B.A.(1987)Interest groups, campaign contributions, and probabilistic voting Public Choice 54 123-139
[4]  
Settle R.F.(1974)Election goals and strategies: Equivalent and nonequivalent candidate objectives American Political Science Review 68 135-152
[5]  
Austen-Smith D.(1991)Campaign spending in congressional elections Economic Inquiry 29 92-100
[6]  
Aranson P.H.(1999)Why do people vote? An experiment in rationality Public Choice 99 35-55
[7]  
Hinich M.J.(2000)Personal productivity and the likelihood of electoral success of political candidates European Journal of Political Economy 16 95-111
[8]  
Ordeshook P.C.(2000)Equilibria in campaign spending games: Theory and evidence American Political Science Review 94 595-609
[9]  
Banaian K.(1998)Estimating the effect of campaign spending on Senate election outcomes using instrumental variables American Political Science Review 92 401-411
[10]  
Luksetich W.A.(1979)Sample selection bias as a specification error Econometrica 47 153-161