Incidence and risk factors for severe perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients

被引:31
作者
Nakai A. [1 ]
Yoshida A. [1 ]
Yamaguchi S. [2 ]
Kawabata I. [1 ]
Hayashi M. [1 ]
Yokota A. [1 ]
Isozaki T. [1 ]
Takeshita T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tama Nagayama, Hospital, Nippon Medical School, Tama-City, Tokyo 206-8512
[2] Yamaguchi Hospital, Chiba
关键词
Episiotomy; Japanese; Perineal laceration; Risk factor;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-006-0168-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of severe perineal lacerations defined as either third- or fourth-degree lacerations during normal spontaneous vaginal delivery and to evaluate potential risk factors in Japanese patients. Materials and methods: An electronic audit of the perinatal database at the Tama-Nagayama Hospital of Nippon Medical School and Yamaguchi Hospital from 1997 through 2004 was completed. Singleton vaginal vertex deliveries were analyzed for potential risk factors using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: From the database, 7,946 deliveries were identified, with 135 deliveries resulting in severe lacerations (1.7%). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, severe lacerations were associated significantly with primiparous (odds ratio, 4.36; 95% CI, 2.17-9.57), oxytocin use (odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.27-3.73), midline episiotomy (odds ratio, 4.68; 95% CI, 2.09-11.55), forceps-assisted delivery (odds ratio, 7.11; 95% CI, 1.95-20.59), vacuum-assisted delivery (odds ratio, 5.93; 95% CI, 3.38-10.36), and shorter attendant experience (odds ratio, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.12-9.81). Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that operator factors, such as midline episiotomy, oxytocin use, assisted delivery and attendant experience, are independent risk for severe perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients. The results suggest that midline episiotomy and assisted vaginal delivery, especially forceps-assisted delivery should be avoided in patients who are being delivered of a first child whenever possible. © Springer-Verlag 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 226
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Sultan A., Kamm M., Hudson C., Bartran C., Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears
[2]  
risk factors and outcome of primary repair, Br Med J, 308, pp. 887-891, (1994)
[3]  
Gjessing H., Backe B., Sahlin Y., Third degree obstetric tears: Outcome after primary repair, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 77, pp. 736-740, (1998)
[4]  
Peleg D., Kennedy C.M., Merrill D., Zlatnik F.J., Risk of repetition of severe perineal laceration, Obstet Gynecol, 93, pp. 1021-1024, (1999)
[5]  
Moller Bek K., Laurberg S., Intervention during labor: Risk factors associated with complete tear of the anal sphincter, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 71, pp. 520-524, (1992)
[6]  
Signorello L.B., Harlow B.T., Chekos A.K., Repke J.T., Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: Retrospective cohort study, Br Med J, 320, pp. 86-91, (2000)
[7]  
Riskin-Mashiah S., Smith E.O., Wilkins I.A., Risk factors for severe perineal tear: Can we do better?, Am J Perinatol, 19, pp. 225-234, (2002)
[8]  
Goldberg J., Hyslop T., Tolosa J.E., Sultana C., Racial defferences in severe perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 188, pp. 1063-1067, (2003)
[9]  
Anthony S., Buitendijk S., Zondervan K., Van Rijssel E., Verkerk P., Episiotomies and the occurence of severe perineal lacerations, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 101, pp. 1064-1067, (1994)
[10]  
Walsh C., Mooney E., Upton G., Motson R., Incidence of third-degree perineal tears in labour and outcome after primary repair, Br J Surg, 83, pp. 218-221, (1996)