Agent toolkit satisfaction and use in higher education

被引:5
作者
Alexander Serenko
Brian Detlor
机构
[1] Michael G. DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
agent toolkits; higher education; intelligent agents; satisfaction; technology acceptance model;
D O I
10.1007/BF02940853
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
THIS PAPER presents results from a recent research investigation on the satisfaction and use of intelligent agent toolkits by instructors in higher education. An adaptation of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) linking agent toolkit satisfaction and usage to key characteristics of user considerations, performance, and functionality serves as the study's theoretical framework. Data collection consists of the completion of an online questionnaire by 87 international instructors of agent-related courses. Results indicate that no single uniform toolkit satisfies the needs of instructors. Moreover, findings suggest that satisfaction levels are influenced primarily by user interactions with the toolkit, followed to a lesser extent by toolkit performance and functionality. This has a bearing on the utility of agent toolkits in the classroom as results point to a strong relationship between instructor satisfaction and the continuation of use of agent toolkits in future agent-related courses. Characteristics of an ideal agent toolkit for the classroom are also identified. © 2003 Springer.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 88
页数:23
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
What is AgentBuilder?, (2000)
[2]  
Al-Gahtani S., King M., Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology, Behavoiur & Information Technology, 18, 4, pp. 277-297, (1999)
[3]  
Bellifemine F., Poggi A., Rimassa G., Turci P., An Object-oriented framework to realize agent systems, Proceedings of WOA 2000 Workshop, pp. 52-57, (2000)
[4]  
Berners-Lee T., Hendler J., Lassila O., The semantic web, Scientific American, 284, 5, pp. 34-43, (2001)
[5]  
Chau P.Y.K., Hu P.J., Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 4, pp. 191-229, (2002)
[6]  
Chen L., Gillenson M., Sherrell D., Enticing online consumers: An extended technology acceptance perspective, Information & Management, 39, 8, pp. 705-719, (2002)
[7]  
Davis F., User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, pp. 475-487, (1993)
[8]  
Davis F., Received usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13, 3, pp. 319-340, (1989)
[9]  
Eiter T., Mascardi V., Comparing environments for developing software agents, (2001)
[10]  
Holder L.B., Cook D.J., A client-server computational tool for integrated artificial intelligence curriculum, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12, 2, pp. 1-13, (2001)