Empirical social choice: an introduction

被引:0
作者
Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard
机构
[1] University of Copenhagen,Dept. of Political Science
来源
Public Choice | 2014年 / 158卷
关键词
Social choice; Condorcet’s Paradox; Voting theory; Voting paradoxes; Preferences; Heresthetics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The year 2012 was the 30th anniversary of William H. Riker’s modern classic Liberalism against populism (1982) and is marked by the present special issue. In this introduction, we seek to identify some core elements and evaluate the current status of the Rikerian research program and its empirical applications. Special attention is given to three phenomena and their possible empirical manifestations: The instability of social choice in the form of (1) the possibility of majority cycles, (2) the non-robustness of social choices given alternative voting methods, and (3) the possibility of various forms of manipulation of the decisions (heresthetics). These topics are then connected to the contributions to the current special issue.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 310
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Amadae S. M.(1999)The Rochester school: the origins of positive political theory Annual Review of Political Science 2 269-295
[2]  
Bueno de Mesquita B.(1948)On the rationale of group decision making Journal of Political Economy 56 23-34
[3]  
Black D.(1978)Approval voting American Political Science Review 72 831-847
[4]  
Brams S. J.(2001)William Harrison Riker, September 22, 1920—June 26, 1993 Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 79 3-22
[5]  
Fishburn P. C.(1965)A measure of the importance of cyclical majorities Journal of Economics 75 853-857
[6]  
Bueno de Mesquita B.(1970)The probability of a cyclical majority Econometrica 38 345-354
[7]  
Shepsle K. A.(1981)An approach to empirical measures of voting paradoxes Public Choice 36 193-194
[8]  
Campbell C.(1976)An actual application of collective choice theory to the selection of trajectories for the Mariner Jupiter/Saturn 1977 project Operations Research 24 220-244
[9]  
Tullock G.(1968)The paradox of voting: probability calculations Behavioral Science 13 306-316
[10]  
DeMeyer F.(1983)Condorcet’s paradox Theory and Decision 15 161-197