The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Project: Development and evaluation of a questionnaire assessing patient reported outcomes in people with haemophilia

被引:39
|
作者
Skinner M.W. [1 ]
Chai-Adisaksopha C. [2 ,10 ]
Curtis R. [3 ]
Frick N. [4 ]
Nichol M. [5 ]
Noone D. [6 ]
O'Mahony B. [6 ,7 ]
Page D. [8 ]
Stonebraker J.S. [9 ]
Iorio A. [2 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Institute for Policy Advancement Ltd, 1155 23rd Street NW #3A, Washington, 20037, DC
[2] McMaster University, Department of Medicine, Hamilton
[3] Factor VIII Computing, Berkeley
[4] National Hemophilia Foundation, New York
[5] University of Southern California, Sol Price School of Public Policy, Los Angeles
[6] Irish Haemophilia Society, Dublin
[7] Trinity College Dublin, Dublin
[8] Canadian Hemophilia Society, Montreal
[9] North Carolina State University, Poole College of Management, Raleigh
[10] McMaster University, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Hamilton
关键词
Haemophilia; Patient-centered research; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life;
D O I
10.1186/s40814-018-0253-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The interest of health care agencies, private payers and policy makers for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) is continuously increasing. There is a substantial need to improve capacity to collect and interpret relevant PRO data to support implementation of patient-centered research and optimal care in haemophilia. The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Project aims to develop a patient-led research network, to develop a standardized questionnaire to gather patient-reported outcomes and to perform a feasibility study of implementing the PROBE questionnaire. Methods: A pilot questionnaire was developed using focus group methodology. Content and face validity were assessed by a pool of persons living with haemophilia (PWH) and content experts through interactive workshops. The PROBE questionnaire was translated with the forward-backward approach. PROBE recruited national haemophilia patient non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to administer the questionnaire to people with and without haemophilia. PROBE measured the time to complete the questionnaire and gathered feedback on its content and clarity; staff time and cost required to implement the questionnaire were also collected. Results: The PROBE questionnaire is comprised of four major sections (demographic data, general health problems, haemophilia-related health problems and health-related quality of life using EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS). Seventeen NGOs participated in the pilot study of the PROBE Project, recruiting 656 participants. Of these, 71% completed the questionnaire within 15 min, and all participants completed within 30 min. The median total staff and volunteer time required for the NGOs to carry out the study within their country was 9 h (range 2 to 40 h). NGO costs ranged from $22.00 to $543.00 USD per country, with printing and postage being the most commonly reported expenditures. Conclusions: The PROBE questionnaire assesses patient-important reported outcomes in PWH and control participants, with a demonstrated short completion time. PROBE proved the feasibility to engage diverse patient communities in the structured generation of real-world outcome research at all stages. © 2018 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric properties of the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire
    Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree
    Skinner, Mark W.
    Curtis, Randall
    Frick, Neil
    Nichol, Michael B.
    Noone, Declan
    O'Mahony, Brian
    Page, David
    Stonebraker, Jeffrey
    Thabane, Lehana
    Crowther, Mark
    Iorio, Alfonso
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (08):
  • [2] Test-retest properties of the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire and its constituent domains
    Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree
    Skinner, Mark W.
    Curtis, Randall
    Frick, Neil
    Nichol, Michael B.
    Noone, Declan
    O'Mahony, Brian
    Page, David
    Stonebraker, Jeffrey
    Thabane, Lehana
    Crowther, Mark A.
    Iorio, Alfonso
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2019, 25 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [3] Test-retest reliability of a mobile application of the patient reported outcomes burdens and experiences (PROBE) study
    Curtis, Randall
    Wu, Joanne
    Iorio, Alfonso
    Frick, Neil
    Nichol, Michael
    Noone, Declan
    O'Mahony, Brian
    Page, David
    Stonebraker, Jeffrey
    Kucher, Alexandra
    Clearfield, Elizabeth
    Skinner, Mark W.
    Germini, Federico
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2024, 30 (03) : 702 - 708
  • [4] Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Assessing Diabetes Outcomes
    Kim, Hyon
    Shah, Kunal
    Buettner, Christoph
    ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2022, 51 (04) : 781 - 793
  • [5] Measuring patient-reported outcomes in haemophilia clinical research
    Globe, D.
    Young, N. L.
    Von Mackensen, S.
    Bullinger, M.
    Wasserman, J.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2009, 15 (04) : 843 - 852
  • [6] Evidence of a disability paradox in patient-reported outcomes in haemophilia
    O'Hara, Jamie
    Martin, Antony P.
    Nugent, Diane
    Witkop, Michelle
    Buckner, Tyler W.
    Skinner, Mark W.
    O'Mahony, Brian
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Morgan, George
    Li, Nanxin
    Sawyer, Eileen K.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2021, 27 (02) : 245 - 252
  • [7] Differences and similarities in patient-reported outcomes among men and women with haemophilia
    Kempton, Christine L.
    Guasch, Sara A.
    Buckner, Tyler W.
    Mattis, Shanna
    Fedewa, Stacey A.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2024, 30 (06) : 1383 - 1392
  • [8] Recognizing the need for personalization of haemophilia patient-reported outcomes in the prophylaxis era
    Recht, M.
    Konkle, B. A.
    Jackson, S.
    Neufeld, E. J.
    Rockwood, K.
    Pipe, S.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2016, 22 (06) : 825 - 832
  • [9] Validation of the Achalasia Patient-Reported Outcomes Questionnaire
    Pandolfino, John E.
    Carlson, Dustin A.
    McGarva, Josie
    Kahrilas, Peter J.
    Vaezi, Michael
    Katzka, David
    Taft, Tiffany H.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 56 (10) : 1434 - 1443
  • [10] 'The patient': at the center of patient-reported outcomes
    Awad, A. George
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 15 (05) : 729 - 731