A Generalized 2.5-D Time-Domain Seismic Wave Equation to Accommodate Various Elastic Media and Boundary Conditions

被引:0
作者
Shang-bei Yang
Bing Zhou
Chao-ying Bai
机构
[1] Chang’an University,School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics
[2] Khalifa University of Science and Technology,Earth Sciences
[3] Chang’an University,Institute of Computational Geophysics
来源
Pure and Applied Geophysics | 2021年 / 178卷
关键词
2.5-D; wave equation; numerical solution; elastic anisotropy; finite difference;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The 2.5-D seismic wave numerical simulation method employs point sources from 2-D geological models, enabling the calculation of point source wavefields at pseudo-2-D computational cost. We present herein a generalized 2.5-D first-order time-domain governing equation to model seismic wave propagation in different (acoustic, elastic isotropic, and anisotropic) media, then derive different formulae that incorporate topographic free-surface and fluid–solid interfaces. Furthermore, by assigning different model parameters from point to point, accommodating different boundary conditions, and applying the finite difference approach, we achieve the numerical simulation of seismic wave propagation with just one computer program. Comparisons with 3-D analytic and numerical solutions obtained using different full-space homogeneous models (acoustic, elastic isotropic, and anisotropic) verify the correctness of the 2.5-D method. Comparison of the results with a 3-D pseudospectral method show that the proposed 2.5-D method can simulate seismic wave propagation in various media with different boundary conditions. In addition, unlike the problems encountered when using 2-D numerical solutions for real 3-D applications, the 2.5-D method can be employed directly as a forward modeling method in seismic reverse-time migration and an efficient wavefield conversion tool between practical point source data and artificial line source data for 2-D seismic full waveform inversion.
引用
收藏
页码:2999 / 3025
页数:26
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Auer L(2013)A critical appraisal of asymptotic 3D-to-2D data transformation in full-waveform seismic crosshole tomography Geophysics 78 R235-R247
[2]  
Nuber AM(1962)Long-wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering Journal of Geophysical Research 67 4427-4440
[3]  
Greenhalgh SA(2014)A full waveform tomography algorithm for teleseismic body and surface waves in 2.5 dimensions Geophysical Journal International 198 1775-1794
[4]  
Maurer H(1983)Reverse time migration Geophysics 48 1514-1524
[5]  
Marelli S(1994)Calculation of synthetic seismograms in a laterally varying medium by the boundary element discrete wave number method Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 84 1869-1881
[6]  
Backus GE(1984)The magnitude, symmetry and origin of upper mantle anisotropy based on fabric analyses of ultramafic tectonites Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 76 89-111
[7]  
Baker B(1985)Evaluation of anisotropy by shear-wave splitting Geophysics 50 142-152
[8]  
Roecker S(1984)Seismic anisotropy-the state of the art: II Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 76 1-16
[9]  
Baysal E(2011)Least-squares migration of multisource data with a deblurring filter Geophysics 76 R135-R146
[10]  
Kosloff D(2001)Excitation of t-phase by seafloor scattering The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109 1944-1954