Modeling uncertainty of expert elicitation for use in risk-based optimization

被引:0
作者
Michael D. Teter
Johannes O. Royset
Alexandra M. Newman
机构
[1] Colorado School of Mines,Operations Research with Engineering Program
[2] Naval Postgraduate School,Department of Operations Research
[3] Colorado School of Mines,Mechanical Engineering Department
来源
Annals of Operations Research | 2019年 / 280卷
关键词
Exponential epi-splines; Nonparametric density estimation; Optimization; Mathematical programming; Capital budgeting; Judgment elicitation; Subject matter expert; Superquantile;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Capital budgeting optimization models, used in a broad number of fields, require certain and uncertain parameters. Often times, elicited subject matter expert (SME) opinion is used as a parameter estimate, which does not always yield perfect information or correspond to a single value. Because of the uncertainty of the elicitation, the unknown true value of a parameter can be modeled as a random variable from a to-be-determined distribution. We estimate a univariate distribution using four different approaches, the Beta and Gaussian distributions, a standard Gaussian Kernel estimate, and an exponential epi-spline. We also capture dependencies within the parameters through three multivariate approaches: the multivariate Gaussian distribution, the multivariate Kernel and the multivariate exponential epi-spline. This is the first three-dimensional application of the latter. Sampling from the densities, we generate scenarios and implement a superquantile risk-based, capital budgeting optimization model. Numerical experiments contrast the differences between estimators, as well as their effects on an optimal solution. Our findings demonstrate that naively averaging the SME observations for use in optimization, rather than incorporating uncertainty, results in an overly optimistic portfolio. The flexibility of the exponential epi-spline estimator to fuse soft information with observed data produces reasonable density functions for univariate and multivariate random variables. Including a decision-maker’s risk-averseness through risk-based optimization delivers conservative results while incorporating the uncertainty of unknown parameters. We demonstrate a 20% improvement for this specific case when using our approach as opposed to the naive method.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 210
页数:21
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Brown GG(2006)Defending critical infrastructure Interfaces 36 530-544
[2]  
Carlyle M(2004)Optimizing military capital planning Interfaces 34 415-425
[3]  
Salmerón J(2006)Knowledge management at SMEs: Five peculiarities Journal of Knowledge Management 10 32-43
[4]  
Wood K(1994)CONOPT—A large-scale GRG code ORSA Journal on Computing 6 207-216
[5]  
Brown GG(1981)Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods Biometrika 68 589-599
[6]  
Dell RF(2014)Robust UAV mission planning Annals of Operations Research 222 293-315
[7]  
Newman AM(2006)Use of decision analysis in the Army Base Realignment And Closure (BRAC) 2005 military value analysis Decision Analysis 3 33-49
[8]  
Desouza KC(2015)Toward scalable stochastic unit commitment. Part 1: Load scenario generation Energy Systems 6 309-329
[9]  
Awazu Y(2005)Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions Journal of the American Statistical Association 100 680-701
[10]  
Drud AS(1995)Modeling expert opinion arising as a partial probabilistic specification Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 598-604