Multiparameter flow cytometry and ClonoSEQ correlation to evaluate precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia measurable residual disease

被引:0
|
作者
Nouran Momen
Joseph Tario
Kai Fu
You-Wen Qian
机构
[1] Roswell Park Cancer Institute,Department of Pathology
[2] Cairo University,Clinical & Chemical Pathology Department
来源
Journal of Hematopathology | 2023年 / 16卷
关键词
Precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia; Measurable residual disease; Multiparametric flow cytometry; Next-generation sequencing; Sensitivity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Measurable residual disease (MRD) detection for precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has become the standard of care. However, the testing methodology has not been standardized. We aim to correlate COG multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and ClonoSEQ techniques to assess the test characteristics, to study abnormal immunophenotype for B-ALL MRD, and to observe B-ALL clonal evolution and the impact of blinatumomab therapy on MFC testing. MFC and molecular reports were retrieved from electronic medical records and data was reviewed. Included in this study were 74 bone marrow samples collected from 31 B-ALL patients at our institution between January 2021 and March 2022. COG MFC and ClonoSEQ results were concordant in 59/74 samples (80%) with positive concordant results in 12 samples (16%) and negative concordant results in 47 samples (64%). Discordant results were seen in 15/74 samples (20%), with 14 samples (19%) showing ClonoSEQ + /MFC- results and only 1 sample (1%) showing MFC + /ClonoSEQ- result. ClonoSEQ + /MFC- cases had MRD values ranging from 1 to 1400 cells/million nucleated cells with 86% of cases showing MRD values of < 100 cells/million nucleated cells. Newly identified dominant sequences were detected using ClonoSEQ in 2/31 patients (6%) during follow-up. All 14 bone marrow samples from 8 patients, who had gone through blinatumomab immunotherapy, were MRD negative by MFC, but 3 cases were MRD positive by ClonoSEQ. Our results show strong correlation between COG MFC and ClonoSEQ (r = 0.96), and both methods are complementary. Clonal evolution may occur, and blinatumomab immunotherapy may impact MFC B-ALL MRD evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Voyage of Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Assessment in Multiple Myeloma Using Multiparametric Flow Cytometry
    Das, Nupur
    Gupta, Ritu
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND PAEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 44 (05) : 515 - 524
  • [42] Computational flow cytometry provides accurate assessment of measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
    Nguyen, Phillip. C. C.
    Nguyen, Vuong
    Baldwin, Kylie
    Kankanige, Yamuna
    Blombery, Piers
    Came, Neil
    Westerman, David. A. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2023, 202 (04) : 760 - 770
  • [43] Evaluation of multiple myeloma measurable residual disease by high sensitivity flow cytometry: An international harmonized approach for data analysis
    Soh, Kah Teong
    Came, Neil
    Otteson, Gregory E.
    Jevermovic, Dragan
    Shi, Min
    Olteanu, Horatiu
    Natoni, Alessandro
    Lagoo, Anand
    Theakston, Edward
    Oskarsson, Jon Porir
    Gorniak, Malgorzata
    Grigoriadis, George
    Arroz, Maria
    Fletcher, Matthew
    Lin, Pei
    Ludwig, Peter
    Tembhare, Prashant
    Matuzeviciene, Reda
    Radzevicius, Mantas
    Kay, Sigi
    Chen, Weina
    Cabrita, Carina
    Wallace, Paul K.
    CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2022, 102 (02) : 88 - 106
  • [44] Measurable Residual Disease Assessment and Allogeneic Transplantation as Consolidation Therapy in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Colombia
    Felipe Combariza, Juan
    Arango, Marcos
    Diaz, Laura
    Agudelo, Claudia
    Hernandez, Sonia
    Maria Madera, Ana
    Leon, Guillermo
    Avila, Vladimir
    Bautista, Leonardo
    Valdes, Jaime
    Orduz, Rocio
    Mejia, Fabian
    Moreno, Liliana
    Ramirez, Carlos
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2021, 21 (04) : E365 - E372
  • [45] Is next-generation sequencing the future of measurable residual disease assays for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia?
    Short, Nicholas J.
    Kantarjian, Hagop
    Jabbour, Elias
    EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 17 (06) : 189 - 191
  • [46] ZNF384 fusion transcript levels for measurable residual disease monitoring in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
    Shi, Zong-Yan
    Wang, Xu
    Chen, Wen-Min
    Li, Ling-Di
    Hao, Yue
    Li, Jin-Ying
    Sun, Kai
    Zhao, Xiao-Su
    Jiang, Hao
    Jiang, Qian
    Huang, Xiao-Jun
    Qin, Ya-Zhen
    HEMATOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [47] A 19-color single-tube full spectrum flow cytometry assay for the detection of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia
    Fokken, Hendrik
    Waclawski, Julian
    Kattre, Nadine
    Kloos, Arnold
    Mueller, Sebastian
    Ettinger, Max
    Kacprowski, Tim
    Heuser, Michael
    Maetzig, Tobias
    Schwarzer, Adrian
    CYTOMETRY PART A, 2024, 105 (03) : 181 - 195
  • [48] Relevance of flow cytometric categorization and end-of-induction measurable residual disease assessment in pediatric and adult T-lymphoblastic leukemia patients
    Bommannan, Karthik
    Arumugam, Jhansi Rani
    Radhakrishnan, Venkatraman
    Kalaiyarasi, Jayachandran Perumal
    Karunakaran, Parathan
    Mehra, Nikita
    Sagar, Tenali Gnana
    Sundersingh, Shirley
    BLOOD RESEARCH, 2022, 57 (03) : 175 - 196
  • [49] Prospective Comparison of Two Flow Cytometry Methodologies for Monitoring Minimal Residual Disease in a Multicenter Treatment Protocol of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
    Luria, Drorit
    Rosenthal, Eti
    Steinberg, David
    Kodman, Yona
    Safanaiev, Marina
    Amariglio, Ninette
    Avigad, Smadar
    Stark, Batia
    Izraeli, Shai
    CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2010, 78B (06) : 365 - 371
  • [50] A systematic review of outcomes after stem cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia with or without measurable residual disease
    Shah, Shweta
    Martin, Amber
    Turner, Monica
    Cong, Ze
    Zaman, Faraz
    Stein, Anthony
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2020, 61 (05) : 1052 - 1062