Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center

被引:17
|
作者
Pellegrino A. [1 ]
Damiani G.R. [1 ,2 ]
Fachechi G. [1 ]
Corso S. [1 ]
Pirovano C. [1 ]
Trio C. [1 ]
Villa M. [1 ]
Turoli D. [1 ]
Youssef A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASTT LECCO, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Dell’Eremo Street 11, Lecco
[2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna-Sant’orsola, Bologna
关键词
Cost analysis; Lapaprotomy; Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-016-0625-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the rapid uptake of robotic surgery, the effectiveness of robotically assisted hysterectomy (RAH) remains uncertain, due to the costs widely variable. Observed the different related costs of robotic procedures, in different countries, we performed a detailed economic analysis of the cost of RAH compared with total laparoscopic (TLH) and open hysterectomy (OH). The three surgical routes were matched according to age, BMI, and comorbidities. Hysterectomy costs were collected prospectively from September 2014 to September 2015. Direct costs were determined by examining the overall medical pathway for each type of intervention. Surgical procedure cost for RAH was €3598 compared with €912 for TLH and €1094 for OH. The cost of the robot-specific supplies was €2705 per intervention. When considering overall medical surgical care, the patient treatment average cost of a RAH was €4695 with a hospital stay (HS) of 2 days (range 2–4) compared with €2053 for TLH and €2846 for OH. The main driver of additional costs is disposable instruments of the robot, which is not compensated by the hospital room costs and by an experienced team staff. Implementation of strategies to reduce the cost of robotic instrumentation is due. No significant cost difference among the three procedures was observed; however, despite the optimal operative time, the experienced, surgeon and the lower HS, RAH resulted 2, 3 times and 1, 6 times more expensive in our institution than TLH and OH, respectively. © 2016, Springer-Verlag London.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 121
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Cost Analysis When Open Surgeons Perform Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
    Lee, Ted
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    Kantartzis, Kelly L.
    Ahn, Ki Hoon
    Bonidie, Michael J.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2014, 18 (04)
  • [2] Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach
    dos Reis, Ricardo
    Andrade, Carlos E. M. C.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Munsell, Mark
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (07) : 1224 - 1230
  • [3] Posterosuperior Segments of the Liver: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes between Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by a Single Surgeon
    Giuffrida, Mario
    Iaria, Maurizio
    Dalla Valle, Raffaele
    LIVERS, 2023, 3 (04): : 674 - 686
  • [4] Cost-Utility Analysis of Open Radical Hysterectomy Compared to Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Michaan, Nadav
    Leshno, Moshe
    Fire, Gil
    Safra, Tamar
    Rosenberg, Michal
    Peleg-Hasson, Shira
    Grisaru, Dan
    Laskov, Ido
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [5] Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy Performed via Minimally Invasive Routes Compared with Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Natarajan, Purushothaman
    Delanerolle, Gayathri
    Dobson, Lucy
    Xu, Cong
    Zeng, Yutian
    Yu, Xuan
    Marston, Kathleen
    Phan, Thuan
    Choi, Fiona
    Barzilova, Vanya
    Powell, Simon G.
    Wyatt, James
    Taylor, Sian
    Shi, Jian Qing
    Hapangama, Dharani K.
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [6] Perioperative Cost Analysis of Minimally Invasive vs Open Resection of Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors
    Fontes, Ricardo B. V.
    Wewel, Joshua T.
    O'Toole, John E.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 78 (04) : 531 - 538
  • [7] Surgeon and patient-specific factors influencing the decision for minimally invasive or open surgery in acute bowel obstruction: a retrospective single-center analysis
    Hoi, Hannes
    Gruenbart, Martin
    Paal, Peter
    de Cillia, Michael
    Hell, Tobias
    Weiss, Helmut
    Mittermair, Christof
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (08) : 3747 - 3754
  • [8] Surgeon and patient-specific factors influencing the decision for minimally invasive or open surgery in acute bowel obstruction: a retrospective single-center analysis
    Hannes Hoi
    Martin Grünbart
    Peter Paal
    Michael de Cillia
    Tobias Hell
    Helmut Weiss
    Christof Mittermair
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2022, 407 : 3747 - 3754
  • [9] Minimally invasive vs open nephrectomy in the modern era: does approach matter?
    Golombos, David M.
    Chughtai, Bilal
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Thomas, Dominique
    Mao, Jialin
    Te, Alexis
    O'Malley, Padraic
    Scherr, Douglas S.
    Del Pizzo, Joseph
    Hu, Jim C.
    Sedrakyan, Art
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (10) : 1557 - 1568
  • [10] Minimally invasive vs open nephrectomy in the modern era: does approach matter?
    David M. Golombos
    Bilal Chughtai
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Dominique Thomas
    Jialin Mao
    Alexis Te
    Padraic O’Malley
    Douglas S. Scherr
    Joseph Del Pizzo
    Jim C. Hu
    Art Sedrakyan
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 1557 - 1568