Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy of the Binding of Nucleotide Excision Repair Protein XPC-hHr23B with DNA Substrates

被引:0
作者
Y. Roche
D. Zhang
G. M. J. Segers-Nolten
W. Vermeulen
C. Wyman
K. Sugasawa
J. Hoeijmakers
C. Otto
机构
[1] University of Twente,Biophysical Engineering Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology and BMTI
[2] Erasmus University,Medical Genetics Center, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics
[3] Kobe University,Laboratory of Cellular Physiology, Biosignal Research Center
[4] UMR Plantes-Microbe-Environnement,Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
来源
Journal of Fluorescence | 2008年 / 18卷
关键词
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy; Nucleotide excision repair; Oligonucleotides; Macromolecules interaction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The interaction of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein dimeric complex XPC-hHR23B, which is implicated in the DNA damage recognition step, with three Cy3.5 labeled 90-bp double-stranded DNA substrates (unmodified, with a central unpaired region, and cholesterol modified) and a 90-mer single-strand DNA was investigated in solution by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Autocorrelation functions obtained in the presence of an excess of protein show larger diffusion times (τd) than for free DNA, indicating the presence of DNA–protein bound complexes. The fraction of DNA bound (θ), as a way to describe the percentage of protein bound to DNA, was directly estimated from FCS data. A significantly stronger binding capability for the cholesterol modified substrate (78% DNA bound) than for other double-stranded DNA substrates was observed, while the lowest affinity was found for the single-stranded DNA (27%). This is in accordance with a damage recognition role of the XPC protein. The similar affinity of XPC for undamaged and ‘bubble’ DNA substrates (58% and 55%, respectively) indicates that XPC does not specifically bind to this type of DNA substrate comprising a large (30-nt) central unpaired region.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 137 条
  • [21] Hess ST(2001)A multistep damage recognition mechanism for global genomic nucleotide excision repair Genes & Development 15 507-U7
  • [22] Webb WW(1998)Xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein complex is the initiator of global genome nucleotide excision repair Mol Cell 2 223-11050
  • [23] Webb WW(2002)A molecular mechanism for DNA damage recognition by the xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein complex DNA Repair 1 95-8294
  • [24] Meseth U(2007)Recognition of DNA damage by the Rad4 nucleotide excision repair protein Nature 449 570-1235
  • [25] Wohland T(2004)Monomer dynamics in double-and single-stranded DNA polymers Phys Rev Lett 92 048303-290
  • [26] Rigler R(1996)Replication protein A confers structure-specific endonuclease activities to the XPF-ERCC1 and XPG subunits of human DNA repair excision nuclease J Biol Chem 271 11047-18768
  • [27] Vogel H(1996)Reaction mechanism of human DNA repair excision nuclease J Biol Chem 271 8285-6587
  • [28] Sevenich FW(2006)Spatial fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy Appl Opt 45 1225-13
  • [29] Langowski J(2000)Stable binding of human XPC complex to irradiated DNA confers strong discrimination for damaged sites J Mol Biol 300 275-21
  • [30] Weiss V(1999)Order of assembly of human DNA repair excision nuclease J Biol Chem 274 18759-2481