Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy of the Binding of Nucleotide Excision Repair Protein XPC-hHr23B with DNA Substrates

被引:0
作者
Y. Roche
D. Zhang
G. M. J. Segers-Nolten
W. Vermeulen
C. Wyman
K. Sugasawa
J. Hoeijmakers
C. Otto
机构
[1] University of Twente,Biophysical Engineering Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology and BMTI
[2] Erasmus University,Medical Genetics Center, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics
[3] Kobe University,Laboratory of Cellular Physiology, Biosignal Research Center
[4] UMR Plantes-Microbe-Environnement,Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
来源
Journal of Fluorescence | 2008年 / 18卷
关键词
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy; Nucleotide excision repair; Oligonucleotides; Macromolecules interaction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The interaction of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein dimeric complex XPC-hHR23B, which is implicated in the DNA damage recognition step, with three Cy3.5 labeled 90-bp double-stranded DNA substrates (unmodified, with a central unpaired region, and cholesterol modified) and a 90-mer single-strand DNA was investigated in solution by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Autocorrelation functions obtained in the presence of an excess of protein show larger diffusion times (τd) than for free DNA, indicating the presence of DNA–protein bound complexes. The fraction of DNA bound (θ), as a way to describe the percentage of protein bound to DNA, was directly estimated from FCS data. A significantly stronger binding capability for the cholesterol modified substrate (78% DNA bound) than for other double-stranded DNA substrates was observed, while the lowest affinity was found for the single-stranded DNA (27%). This is in accordance with a damage recognition role of the XPC protein. The similar affinity of XPC for undamaged and ‘bubble’ DNA substrates (58% and 55%, respectively) indicates that XPC does not specifically bind to this type of DNA substrate comprising a large (30-nt) central unpaired region.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 137 条
  • [1] Michalet X(2002)Single-molecule spectroscopy and microscopy Comptes Rendus Physique 3 619-644
  • [2] Weiss S(2003)Fluorescence spectroscopy of single molecules under ambient conditions: methodology and technology Chemphyschem 4 793-808
  • [3] Bohmer M(2003)Methods of single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy Rev Sci Instrum 74 3597-3619
  • [4] Enderlein J(2000)Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: molecular recognition at the single molecule level J Mol Recognit 13 93-100
  • [5] Moerner WE(2004)Single-molecule spectroscopic methods Curr Opin Struct Biol 14 531-297
  • [6] Fromm DP(2002)Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: the technique and its applications Rep Prog Phys 65 251-27
  • [7] Van Craenenbroeck E(1974)Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: I. Conceptual basis and theory Biopolymers 13 1-175
  • [8] Engelborghs Y(1993)Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with high count rate and low-background-analysis of translational diffusion Eur Biophys J 22 169-166
  • [9] Haustein E(2003)Ultrasensitive investigations of biological systems by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy Methods 29 153-2317
  • [10] Schwille P(2002)Focal volume optics and experimental artifacts in confocal fluorescence correlation spectroscopy Biophys J 83 2300-3983