Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology

被引:0
作者
Opdam P. [1 ]
Foppen R. [2 ]
Vos C. [2 ]
机构
[1] ALTERRA, Dept. Landscape Ecol. Dept. E., Nat. Conserv. Plant Ecol. Grp., W.
[2] ALTERRA, Department of Landscape Ecology, Wageningen Univ. Res. Ctr., P.
关键词
application of empirical data; dispersal corridors; habitat network; integration of pattern and process approach; landscape planning; metapopulation studies;
D O I
10.1023/A:1014475908949
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landscapes are studied by pattern (the geographical approach) and by process (the ecological approach within landscape ecology). The future of landscape ecology depends on whether the two approaches can be integrated. We present an approach to bridge the gap between the many detailed process studies on species, and applied activities such as landscape evaluation and design, which require integrated knowledge. The approach consists of four components: 1) Empirical case studies of different scales, organisms and processes. 2) Modeling studies to extrapolate empirical studies across space and time. 3) Modeling studies to produce guidelines and standards for landscape conditions. 4) Methods and tools for integration to the landscape level, which can be built into multidisciplinary tools for design and evaluation. We conclude that in the landscape ecological literature, the steps 1 and 2 are well represented, whereas the steps 3 and 4 are mostly neglected. We challenge landscape ecologists to push landscape ecology to a higher level of maturation and to further develop its profile as a problem-oriented science.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 779
页数:12
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Ahern J., Integration of landscape ecology and landscape design: An evolutionary process, Issues in Landscape Ecology, pp. 119-123, (1999)
[2]  
Andren H., Population responses to habitat fragmentation: Statistical power and the random sample hypothesis, Oikos, 76, pp. 235-242, (1996)
[3]  
Bastian O., Roder M., Assessment of landscape change by land evaluation of past and present situation, Landscape and Urban Planning, 41, pp. 163-170, (1998)
[4]  
Baudry J., Merriam H.G., Connectivity and connectedness: Functional versus structural patterns in landscapes, Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar of the International Association of Landscape Ecology, pp. 23-28, (1988)
[5]  
Bennett A.F., Linkages in the Landscape, (1999)
[6]  
Bonner J., Wildlife's roads to nowhere?, New Scientist, 143, pp. 30-34, (1994)
[7]  
Chardon J.P., Foppen R.P.B., Geilen N., LARCH-RIVER: A method to assess the functioning of rivers as ecological networks, European Water Management, 3, pp. 35-43, (2000)
[8]  
Duhme F., Pauleit S., Some examples of different landscape systems and their biodiversity potential, Landsc. Urban Planning, 41, pp. 249-262, (1998)
[9]  
Fahrig L., Merriam G., Habitat patch connectivity and population survival, Ecology, 66, pp. 1762-1768, (1985)
[10]  
Fahrig L., When is a landscape perspective important?, Issues in Landscape Ecology, pp. 145-147, (1999)