Two-item promis® global physical and mental health scales

被引：186

作者：

Hays R.D. ^{[1
]}

Schalet B.D. ^{[1
]}

Spritzer K.L. ^{[1
]}

Cella D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Center for Maximizing Outcomes and Research on Effectiveness (C-MORE), University of California, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, 90024, CA

来源：

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes | / 1卷 / 1期

关键词：

Global health; Patient-reported outcomes; PROMIS®;

D O I：

10.1186/s41687-017-0003-8

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: Self-reports of health provide useful information about function and well-being that can improve communication between patients and clinicians. Global health items provide summary information that are predictive of health care utilization and mortality. There is a need for parsimonious global health scales for use in large sample surveys. This study evaluates the reliability and validity of brief measures of global physical health and mental health in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement and Information System (PROMIS®) project. Methods: A total of 21,133 persons included in the PROMIS development sample: 52% female; 82% White, 9% Black, 9% Hispanic; median age of 50 years. We identified two global physical health items (GPH-2) and two global mental health items (GMH-2) with highest discrimination parameters and compared their reliabilities and construct validity to that of the original 4-item scales (GPH-4 and GMH-4) and a single global health item (Global01). Results: Internal consistency reliability was 0.73 for the GPH-2(versus0.81fortheGPH-4)and0.81forthe GMH-2 (versus 0.86 for the GMH-4). Marginal reliabilities were 0.55 for Global01, 0.70 for GPH-2, 0.79 for GPH-4, 0.80 for GMH-2, and 0.86 for GMH-4. The product-moment correlation between the GPH-2 and GPH-4 was 0.94 and between GMH-2 and GMH-4 was 0.97. The 2-item and 4-item versions of the scales had similar correlations with PROMIS domain scores, the EQ-5D-3L and comorbidities, but the 4-item scales were more strongly correlated with these measures. Conclusions: Adding a single item to a large cross-sectional population survey can cost as much as $100,000. The 2-item variants of the PROMIS global health scales reduce the cost of use on national surveys by 50%, a substantial cost savings. These briefer scales are also more practical for use in clinical practice. The 2-item versions of the PROMIS global health scales display adequate reliability for group comparisons and their associations with other indicators of health are similar to that of the original 4-item scales. The briefer scales are psychometrically sound and reduce burden of survey administration. © The Author(s). 2017 Open Access.

引用

共 16 条

[1]

Cella D., Riley W., Stone A., Et al., Initial item banks and first wave testing of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) network: 2005-2008, J Clin Epidemiol, 63, pp. 1179-1194, (2010)

[2]

Snyder C.F., Aaronson N.K., Choucair A.K., Elliott T.E., Greenhalgh J., Halyard M.Y., Hess R., Miller D.M., Reeve B.B., Santana M., Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations, Qual Life Res, 21, 8, pp. 1305-1314, (2012)

[3]

Desalvo K.B., Bloser N., Reynolds K., Et al., Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question

[4]

a meta-analysis, J Gen Intern Med, 21, pp. 267-275, (2006)

[5]

Riley W.T., Rothrock N., Bruce B., Christodolou C., Cook K., Hahn E.A., Cella D., Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: Further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks, Qual Life Res, 19, 9, pp. 1311-1321, (2010)

[6]

Stewart A.L., Hays R.D., Ware J.E., Health perceptions, energy/ fatigue, and health distress measures, Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach, (1992)

[7]

Hays R.D., Spritzer K.L., Thompson W.W., Et al., U.S. general population estimate for “excellent” to “poor” self-rated health item, J Gen Intern Med, 30, pp. 1511-1516, (2015)

[8]

Hays R.D., Reise S., Calderon J.L., How much is lost in using single items?, J Gen Intern Med, 27, pp. 1402-1403, (2013)

[9]

Hays R.D., Liu H., Kapteyn A., Use of internet panels to conduct surveys, Behav Res Methods, 47, 3, pp. 685-690, (2015)

[10]

Liu H.H., Cella D., Gershon R., Shen J., Morales L.S., Riley W., Hays R.D., Representativeness of the PROMIS internet panel, J Clin Epidemiol, 63, 11, pp. 1169-1178, (2010)

← 1 2 →