Vagal nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy: the surgical procedure and complications in 100 implantations by a single medical center

被引:0
作者
Gilad Horowitz
Moran Amit
Itzhak Fried
Miri Y. Neufeld
Liad Sharf
Uri Kramer
Dan M. Fliss
机构
[1] Tel-Aviv University,Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck and Maxillo
[2] Tel-Aviv University,facial Surgery, Tel
[3] Tel-Aviv University,Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine
[4] Tel-Aviv University,Department of Neurosurgery, Tel
来源
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | 2013年 / 270卷
关键词
Vagal nerve stimulator (VNS); Seizure; Complications;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 1997, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of intermittent stimulation of the left vagal nerve as adjunctive therapy for seizure control. Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has since been considered a safe and effective treatment for medically intractable seizures. The objective of this study is to present our experience with the surgical procedure and outcomes after VNS insertion in the first 100 consecutive patients treated at the Tel-Aviv “Sourasky” Medical Center (TASMC). All patients who underwent VNS device implantation by the authors at TASMC between 2005 and 2011 were studied. The collected data included age at onset of epilepsy, seizure type, duration of epilepsy, age at VNS device implantation, seizure reduction, surgical complications, and adverse effects of VNS over time. Fifty-three males and 47 females, age 21.2 ± 11.1 years, underwent VNS implantation. Indications for surgery were medically refractory epilepsy. The most common seizure type was focal (55 patients, 55 %). Seizure duration until implantation was 14.4 ± 9 years. Mean follow-up time after device insertion was 24.5 ± 22 months. Complications were encountered in 12 patients. The most common complication was local infection (6 patients, 6 %). Six devices were removed—four due to infection and two due to loss of clinical effect. Currently, 63 patients remain in active long-term follow-up; of these, 35 patients have >50 % reduction in frequency of attacks.VNS is a well-tolerated and effective therapeutic alternative in the management of medically refractory epilepsy. The surgical procedure is safe and has a low complication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 358
页数:3
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Milby AH(2009)Vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory epilepsy Neurotherapeutics 6 228-237
[2]  
Halpern CH(2000)Efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in children with medically refractory epilepsy Neurosurgery 47 1353-1357
[3]  
Baltuch GH(2006)Vagus nerve stimulation for intractable seizures in children Pediatr Neurol 35 323-326
[4]  
Patwardhan RV(2006)Long-term results with vagus nerve stimulation in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy Seizure 15 491-503
[5]  
Stong B(2001)Vagus nerve stimulation therapy in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy: retrospective study J Child Neurol 16 843-848
[6]  
Bebin EM(2010)Vagus nerve stimulation for the management of seizures in children: an 8-year experience J Pediatr Surg 45 1479-1483
[7]  
Mathisen J(2008)Vagus nerve stimulation: current concepts Neurosurg Focus 25 E9-441
[8]  
Grabb PA(2001)EEG changes with vagus nerve stimulation J Clin Neurophysiol 18 434-1255
[9]  
Saneto RP(2011)Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a meta-analysis of efficacy and predictors of response J Neurosurg 115 1248-78
[10]  
Sotero de Menezes MA(2009)Management of vagal nerve stimulator infections: do they need to be removed? J Neurosurg Pediatr 3 73-564