Ultrasonic Non-destructive Evaluation of Titanium Diffusion Bonds

被引:0
|
作者
K. Milne
P. Cawley
P. B. Nagy
D. C. Wright
A. Dunhill
机构
[1] Imperial College London,RCNDE, Department of Mechanical Engineering
[2] University of Cincinnati,School of Aerospace Systems
[3] Rolls-Royce plc,undefined
来源
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation | 2011年 / 30卷
关键词
Diffusion bond; Partial bond; Titanium; Imperfect interface; Interfacial stiffness; Ultrasonic reflection coefficient; Phase;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Diffusion bonds offer several advantages over alternative welding methods, including the ability to produce near-net shapes and achieve almost parent metal strength. However, voids remnant from the joining process can be tens of microns in their lateral dimension, making them difficult to detect with conventional pulse-echo immersion inspection at any significant metal depth. In titanium the inspection is particularly challenging; the anisotropic microstructure is highly scattering and the diffusion bond itself forms an interface between regions of preferred crystallographic orientation (macrozones), which can act as a weak spatially coherent reflector. A simple interfacial spring model predicts that, for partial bonds (sub-wavelength voids distributed on the bond line) and at certain frequencies, the phase of the signal can be used to separate the component of the signal due to the change in texture at the interface and the component due to the flaw. Here it is shown that the phase of the signal from an interface is also affected by the anisotropic microtexture of Ti–6Al–4V. Good separation between well-bonded and partially bonded samples was achieved using a symmetric inspection, where the magnitude and phase of the reflection coefficient were calculated for normal incidence from opposite sides of the diffusion bond.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 236
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasonic Non-destructive Evaluation of Titanium Diffusion Bonds
    Milne, K.
    Cawley, P.
    Nagy, P. B.
    Wright, D. C.
    Dunhill, A.
    JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2011, 30 (04) : 225 - 236
  • [2] Destructive and non-destructive evaluation of copper diffusion bonds
    Kumar, S. Suresh
    Ravisankar, B.
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2016, 23 : 13 - 20
  • [3] ULTRASONIC TOMOGRAPHY FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION
    EBERHARD, JW
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 1982, 12 : 1 - 21
  • [4] NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING AND ACOUSTIC MICROSCOPY OF DIFFUSION BONDS
    DERBY, B
    BRIGGS, GAD
    WALLACH, ER
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 1983, 18 (08) : 2345 - 2353
  • [5] Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: A review
    Drinkwater, Bruce W.
    Wilcox, Paul D.
    NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 39 (07) : 525 - 541
  • [6] APPLICATION OF ULTRASONIC MICROSCOPY TO NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION
    JOSEPH, S
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 1989, 122 (01): : 133 - 135
  • [7] QUANTITATIVE ULTRASONIC NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION METHODS
    THOMPSON, RB
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1983, 50 (4B): : 1191 - 1201
  • [8] Topographic Metamaterials for Ultrasonic Non-destructive Evaluation
    Manjunath, C. T.
    Rajagopal, Prabhu
    2017 PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM - SPRING (PIERS), 2017, : 2688 - 2693
  • [9] INDUCTION THERMOGRAPHY FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF ADHESIVE BONDS
    Balaji, L.
    Balasubramaniam, Krishnan
    Krishnamurthy, C. V.
    REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLS 32A AND 32B, 2013, 1511 : 579 - 586
  • [10] Ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation of solid state welds
    Thomas, Graham
    Spingarn, Jay
    Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, 1988, 7 B : 1319 - 1325