An examination of research data sharing and re-use: implications for data citation practice

被引:0
作者
Hyoungjoo Park
Dietmar Wolfram
机构
[1] University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee,School of Information Studies
来源
Scientometrics | 2017年 / 111卷
关键词
Citation analysis; Data citation; Data sharing; Data re-use; Citer-based analysis; Research data; 62-07 data analysis; C02 mathematical methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines characteristics of data sharing and data re-use in Genetics and Heredity, where data citation is most common. This study applies an exploratory method because data citation is a relatively new area. The Data Citation Index (DCI) on the Web of Science was selected because DCI provides a single access point to over 500 data repositories worldwide and to over two million data studies and datasets across multiple disciplines and monitors quality research data through a peer review process. We explore data citations for Genetics and Heredity, as a case study by examining formal citations recorded in the DCI and informally by sampling a selection of papers for implicit data citations within publications. Citer-based analysis is conducted in order to remedy self-citation in the data citation phenomena. We explore 148 sampled citing articles in order to identify factors that influence data sharing and data re-use, including references, main text, supplementary data/information, acknowledgments, funding information, author information, and web/author resources. This study is unique in that it relies on a citer-based analysis approach and by analyzing peer-reviewed and published data, data repositories, and citing articles of highly productive authors where data sharing is most prevalent. This research is intended to provide a methodological and practical contribution to the study of data citation.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 461
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Ajiferuke I(2010)A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 2086-2096
[2]  
Lu K(2015)Mapping methods metadata for research data International Journal of Digital Curation 10 82-94
[3]  
Wolfram D(2001)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Jounal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 558-569
[4]  
Chao T(2015)Supporting data citation: Experiences and best practices of a DOI allocation agency for social sciences Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 3 eP1220-317
[5]  
Cronin B(2009)The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? The Review of Economics Studies 76 283-1332
[6]  
Helbig K(2015)Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 1323-37
[7]  
Hausstein B(2011)Citation and peer review of data: Moving towards formal data publication International Journal of Digital Curation 6 4-260
[8]  
Toepfer R(2014)Extending citer analysis to journal impact evaluation Scientometrics 100 245-298
[9]  
Jones BF(2012)Session summary: The RDAP (research data alliance and preservation) 12 data citation panel Bullentin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 38 31-744
[10]  
Larivière VG(2013)Announcement: Launch of an online data journal Nature 502 142-CIDCR75