Short-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy followed by drug-coated balloon: a preliminary report

被引:0
作者
Akihiko Sato
Mikihiro Kijima
Shohei Ichimura
Daiki Yaegashi
Fumiya Anzai
Takeshi Shimizu
Yuko Matsui
Hironori Kaneko
Keiji Sakamoto
Yoshitane Seino
Yukio Maruyama
Yasuchika Takeishi
机构
[1] Hoshi General Hospital,Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine
[2] Fukushima Medical University,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
来源
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics | 2019年 / 34卷
关键词
Directional coronary atherectomy; Drug-coated balloon; Percutaneous coronary intervention;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) is a unique technique used in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) which involves the removal of plaque from the coronary artery. Treatment with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) appears to be effective, especially when a predilatation of the lesion is performed appropriately. We hypothesize that the combination therapy of DCA with DCB is an effective strategy in PCI. PCI with DCA followed by DCB was performed for 23 patients from December 2014 to April 2017. All DCA procedures were performed under the guidance of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings and all procedures were successfully performed without incurring major complications such as a coronary perforation. Plaque area (PA) was reduced from 77.3 ± 10.4% at baseline to 50.9 ± 9.2% after DCA and luminal cross-sectional area (CSA) after PCI was enlarged from 3.6 ± 1.8 to 9.3 ± 3.3 mm2. Follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) performed at 6–10 months showed no cases having incurred restenosis. Plaque area at follow-up CAG was 52.0 ± 8.5% and luminal CSA was 9.5 ± 2.1 mm2. There were no cases undergoing target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) during the follow-up periods. PCI with DCA followed by DCB might be an effective strategy for de novo lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 154
页数:5
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]  
Topol EJ(1993)A comparison of directional atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. The CAVEAT Study Group N Engl J Med 329 221-227
[2]  
Leya F(1998)‘Optimal’ directional coronary atherectomy: final results of the Optimal Atherectomy Restenosis Study (OARS) Circulation 97 332-339
[3]  
Pinkerton CA(1998)Final results of the Balloon vs Optimal Atherectomy Trial (BOAT) Circulation 97 322-331
[4]  
Whitlow PL(1999)Effects of adjunctive balloon angioplasty after intravascular ultrasound-guided optimal directional coronary atherectomy: the result of Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty After Coronary Atherectomy Study (ABACAS) J Am Coll Cardiol 34 1028-1035
[5]  
Hofling B(1994)A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group N Engl J Med 331 489-495
[6]  
Simonton CA(2004)Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis Circulation 109 634-640
[7]  
Simonton CA(2010)Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old, new, and evolving strategies Circulation 121 1235-1243
[8]  
Leon MB(2007)Pre-drug-eluting stent debulking of bifurcated coronary lesions J Am Coll Cardiol 50 1941-1945
[9]  
Baim DS(2016)Drug-eluting balloons in the treatment of coronary de novo lesions: a comprehensive review Cardiol Ther 5 133-160
[10]  
Hinohara T(2016)Clinical value of drug-coated balloon angioplasty for de novo lesions in patients with coronary artery disease Int J Cardiol 222 112-113