Comparison of the safety and efficacy of one-shot and telescopic metal dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Shahriar Amirhassani
Seyed Habibollah Mousavi-Bahar
Abdolmajid Iloon Kashkouli
Saadat Torabian
机构
[1] Hamadan University of Medical Sciences,Urology and Nephrology Research Center
[2] Hamadan University of Medical Sciences,Research Center for Behavioral Disorders and Substance Abuse
[3] Beheshti Hospital,Urology and Nephrology Research Center
来源
Urolithiasis | 2014年 / 42卷
关键词
Renal calculi; Dilatation; Kidney stone; Nephrolithotomy; Percutaneous;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Minimizing X-ray exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is challenging. Using the single semirigid dilator, also called “one-shot” or “one-stage” is a good alternative to routine telescopic metal dilators to reduce X-ray exposure. Our aim was to compare the single semirigid one-shot dilator with a telescopic metal dilator in PCNL. The intraoperative status was evaluated in 100 consecutive patients randomly assigned to two equal groups undergoing PCNL either with the one-shot (group A) or telescopic technique (group B). No significant difference in stone burden and location existed between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean age of group A and group B was 44.8 ± 15 and 45.6 ± 14 years, respectively (P = 0.78). The mean operation time was 51.14 ± 40.85 min in group A and 57.00 ± 38.85 min in group B (P = 0.46). The mean X-ray exposure time was 41.2 ± 17 and 48.4 ± 15 s in group A and group B, respectively (P = 0.03). The stone-free rate was 94 % (n = 47) in group A and 84 % (n = 42) in group B (P = 0.10). The mean hemoglobin drop was 1.26 ± 0.09 and 1.44 ± 0.11 g/dl in group A and group B, respectively (P = 0.09). The one-shot technique is feasible, safe, and well tolerated in patients undergoing PCNL. In addition to lack of complications, the method also provides less radiation exposure for urologists and nursing teams.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 273
页数:4
相关论文
共 60 条
[11]  
FalahatKar S(2010)Should percutaneous nephrolithotomy be considered the primary therapy for lower pole stones? J Endourol 24 219-503
[12]  
Neiroomand H(2003)Management of lower pole calyceal stones J Endourol 17 501-722
[13]  
Akbarpour M(2004)Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study J Endourol 18 715-380
[14]  
Emadi SA(1984)Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 1984: techniques, results, indications Ann Urol (Paris) 18 371-725
[15]  
Khaki N(2002)Effect of single-dose subarachnoid spinal anesthesia on pain and recovery after unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy J Endourol 16 721-undefined
[16]  
Amjadi M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[17]  
Zolfaghari A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[18]  
Elahian A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[19]  
Tavoosi A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[20]  
Ziaee MSA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined