Controlled-release oxycodone tablets after transdermal-based opioid therapy in patients with cancer and non-cancer pain

被引:2
作者
Enrico Ravera
Salvatore Di Santo
Rosa Bosco
Claudio Arboscello
Renato Chiarlone
机构
[1] Ospedale Bra,Struttura Complessa di Anestesia e Terapia del Dolore
[2] Ospedale San Paolo,Radioterapia Oncologica
[3] Ospedale Santo Spirito,Struttura Complessa di Anestesia e Terapia del Dolore
来源
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research | 2011年 / 23卷
关键词
Chronic pain; oxycodone CR; quality of life; transdermal opioids;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Several publications and guidelines stress the efficacy and safety of opioid-based therapy for cancer and non-cancer pain management. The first point of the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommends that, if possible, analgesics should be given by mouth. This advice fully matches the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, which advise that opioids should be titrated to take effect as rapidly as possible. The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) guidelines specify that transdermal fentanyl should be administered only in patients with stable analgesic requirements. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and influence on the quality of life of controlled-release (CR) oxycodone in patients who had obtained no or only partial pain relief after transdermal (TTD)-based opioid therapy. Methods: Forty-one consecutive patients experiencing persistent cancer and non-cancer related pain and in treatment with transdermal-based opioid therapy for at least 5 days were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter observational study. All patients were switched from transdermal to oral opioid therapy with oxycodone CR for 21 days. Pain intensity was rated on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 (0=no pain, 10=maximum severity). Patients were asked to rate their perceptions on efficacy and pain interference on the quality of life on an NRS from 0 to 10 (0=no interference, 10=maximum interference). Results: After 3 days with oxycodone CR, pain intensity decreased by 38.83% (p<0.001) and maintained a significant decrease throughout the period (T0-T7: −59.71%, p<0.001; T0-T21: −65.75%, p<0.001). The average daily dose of oxycodone CR increased from 68.75 mg at baseline to 72.39 mg after 7 days and was maintained stable until the study ended. At T0, 56.10% of patients suffered from severe pain (NRS 7–10); this percentage had decreased to 2.56% at the end of the study. About 7% of patients considered transdermal therapy effective at baseline; after 21 days, 72.22% and 19.44% of patients considered it effective and very effective, respectively. Quality of life improved significantly during the 21 days with the oral treatment (p<0.001). Conclusions: Switching from transdermal opioid to oxycodone CR treatment is effective and leads to patients’ improved satisfaction and quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 332
页数:4
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Trescot AM(2008)Opioids in the management of chronic non-cancer pain: an update of American Society of the Interventional Pain Physicians’ (ASIPP) guidelines Pain Physician 11 S5-62
[2]  
Helm S(2005)The role of opioids in cancer pain management Pain Pract 5 43-53
[3]  
Hansen H(1996)Pharmacologic treatment of cancer pain N Engl J Med 335 1124-32
[4]  
Fukshansky M(1999)Cancer pain management Med Clin North Am 83 711-36
[5]  
Are M(1999)Aggressive pharmacologic treatment of pain Rheum Dis Clin North Am 25 193-213
[6]  
Burton AW(1994)Current management of pain in patients with cancer Oncology 8 93-115
[7]  
Levy MH(2002)Oncology outpatients with pain from bone metastasis require more than around-the-clock dosing of analgesics to achieve adequate pain control J Pain 3 12-20
[8]  
Chang HM(1994)New clinical-practice guidelines for the management of pain in patients with cancer N Eng J Med 330 651-5
[9]  
Pappagallo M(2005)ESMO Guidelines Task Force. ESMO Minimum Clinical Recommendations for the management of cancer pain Ann Oncol 16 83-5
[10]  
Grossman SA(2001)Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain: the EAPC recommendations Br J Cancer 84 587-93