Expert mathematics teacher educators’ purposes and practices for providing prospective teachers with opportunities to develop pedagogical content knowledge in content courses

被引:1
作者
Aina Appova
Cynthia E. Taylor
机构
[1] The Ohio State University,Department of Teaching and Learning, College of Education and Human Ecology
[2] Millersville University of Pennsylvania,Department of Mathematics
来源
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education | 2019年 / 22卷
关键词
Mathematics teacher educator; Prospective teacher; Mathematics content course; Pedagogical content knowledge; Course purposes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Enhancing teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is essential to improving the teaching and learning of mathematics. Mathematics teacher educators (MTEs) need to help prospective teachers enhance PCK (Marks in J Teach Educ 41(3):3–11, 1990. doi:10.1177/002248719004100302; Mason 2008). However, we know very little about the practices of MTEs, especially in mathematics content courses, as these practices are not widely researched or disseminated (e.g., Bergsten and Grevholm, in: Jaworski, Wood (eds) The international handbook of mathematics teacher education, vol 4, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, pp 223–246, 2008; Floden and Philipp, in: Lester, Ferrini-Mundy (eds) Proceedings of the NCTM research catalyst conference, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, pp 171–176, 2003). This phenomenographical study offers empirical findings on commonly identified purposes across ten expert MTEs who provided K-8 prospective teachers with opportunities to develop PCK in their mathematics content courses. Furthermore, our emergent findings indicated that expert MTEs also provided opportunities for prospective teachers to develop orientations toward teaching the subject, which prompted framework adaptations and articulations of “orientations” as a construct discussed in the broader literature outside of mathematics teacher education research (Magnusson et al., in: Gess-Newsome, Lederman (eds) Examining pedagogical content knowledge, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 95–132, 1999). Research and practitioner implications from this study provide specific PCK-related learning opportunities of prospective teachers through the lenses of expert MTEs’ (personal and professional) purposes and reflections on teaching, as a foundation on which the field can continue building future research and MTEs can continue building their practice in mathematics content courses.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 204
页数:25
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [1] Akerlind G(2005)Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods Higher Education Research & Development 24 321-334
  • [2] Ames C(1992)Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation Journal of Educational Psychology 84 261-272
  • [3] An S(2004)The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school, mathematics teachers in China and the U.S Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 7 145-172
  • [4] Kulm G(2009)Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education The Elementary School Journal 109 458-474
  • [5] Wu Z(2008)Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education 59 389-407
  • [6] Ball DL(2005)Mathematics, mathematicians, and mathematics education Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 42 417-430
  • [7] Sleep L(2010)Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress American Educational Research Journal 47 133-180
  • [8] Boerst TA(2014)Resolving the chicken-or-egg causality dilemma: The longitudinal interplay of teacher knowledge and teacher beliefs Teaching and Teacher Education 37 130-139
  • [9] Bass H(2002)A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews Quality & Quantity 36 391-409
  • [10] Ball DL(2008)Surveying the landscape of teacher education in New York City: Constrained variation and the challenge of innovation Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 30 319-343