Identifying and discriminating expository text structures: An experiment with 4th and 5th grade struggling readers

被引:0
作者
Michael Hebert
Janet J. Bohaty
J. Ron Nelson
Matthew C. Lambert
机构
[1] University of Nebraska—Lincoln,Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, Barkley Memorial Center
[2] University of Nebraska—Lincoln,342 Barkley Memorial Center
[3] University of Nebraska—Lincoln,247B Barkley Memorial Center
[4] University of Nebraska—Lincoln,273 Barkley Memorial Center
来源
Reading and Writing | 2018年 / 31卷
关键词
Text structures; Expository text; Informational text; Reading; Fourth grade; Fifth grade;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Students who struggle with reading have particular trouble with expository text. Instruction in text structures has been shown to be effective for improving expository reading comprehension. However, few studies have been conducted specifically with upper elementary aged struggling readers. To address these issues, we developed a new intervention, Structures, to improve the expository text comprehension of 4th and 5th grade struggling readers. In this study, we conducted a randomized control trial to assess the promise, usability, and feasibility of one component of the intervention designed to teach students to identify and discriminate the five text structures. Forty-five 4th and 5th grade struggling readers were randomly assigned to intervention or business-as-usual conditions. Students in the Structures condition were taught to identify and discriminate among the five text structures used by authors of expository text: description, sequence, cause/effect, compare/contrast, and problem/solution. At post-test, experimental students (n = 24) statistically significantly outperformed control students (n = 21) on a structures identification measure (d = 0.94). No other statistically significant differences were found. However, a practically (but not statistically) significant effect size was found on an oral retell measure (d = 0.29). Results also indicate the materials were usable for teachers and it was feasible to implement the intervention in a school setting. The implications and future directions of the development of remaining components in the Structures intervention are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:2115 / 2145
页数:30
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
Bakken JP(1997)Reading comprehension of expository science material and students with learning disabilities: A comparison of strategies Journal of Special Education 31 300-324
[2]  
Mastropieri MA(1995)Giving a text voice can improve students’ understanding Reading Research Quarterly 30 220-238
[3]  
Scruggs TE(2008)Differential competencies contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts Reading Psychology 29 137-164
[4]  
Beck IL(2002)The effects of instructing the structural aspects of text Educational Studies 28 213-238
[5]  
McKeown MG(2000)3.6 Minutes per Day: The Scarcity of Informational Texts in First Grade Reading Research Quarterly 35 202-224
[6]  
Worthy J(1984)Children’s developing awareness of text structures in expository materials Journal of Educational Psychology 76 65-75
[7]  
Best RM(1991)Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms American Educational Research Journal 28 337-372
[8]  
Floyd RG(1987)Sensitivity to text structure in reading and writing: A comparison between learning disabled and non-learning disabled students Learning Disability Quarterly 10 93-105
[9]  
Mcnamara DS(2005)Expository text comprehension: Helping primary grade teachers use expository texts to their full advantage Reading Psychology 26 211-234
[10]  
Broer NA(2003)Instructional approaches to improving students’ writing of compare-contrast essays: An experimental study Journal of Literacy Research 35 731-756