The adaptability of typical precipitation ensemble prediction systems in the Huaihe River basin, China

被引:0
作者
Han Wang
Ping-an Zhong
Fei-lin Zhu
Qing-wen Lu
Yu-fei Ma
Sun-yu Xu
机构
[1] Hohai University,College of Hydrology and Water Resources
[2] Hohai University,National Engineering Research Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Engineering Safety
来源
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment | 2021年 / 35卷
关键词
Huaihe river basin; Ensemble prediction system; Precipitation forecast; Bayesian model average;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Evaluating the adaptability of precipitation forecasting is of great importance for regional flood control and drought warnings. This study conducted evaluations using the 1–9 days cumulative precipitation forecast data of five typical operational global ensemble prediction systems (EPSs) from TIGGE (i.e., The Observing System Research and Predictability Experiment Interactive Grand Global Ensemble) and the observed daily precipitation data of 40 meteorological stations over the Huaihe River basin (HB). A series of verification metrics is used to evaluate the performances of quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) and probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts (PQPFs) from the five EPSs from April to December 2015 in terms of overall performance, different precipitation thresholds, different lead times and the spatial distribution over the HB. The adaptability of the multimodel superensemble integrated from the five EPSs by the Bayesian model average is also examined during the main flood season. The results show that (1) the forecast quality of the China Meteorological Administration EPS is the worst for all lead times, which may relate to its having the fewest ensemble members. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) EPS performs the best in terms of QPF and PQPF qualities for longer lead times because ECMWF has the largest ensemble members. (2) All EPSs have better discrimination at low thresholds, indicating the reference value for drought warnings. ECMWF is expected to obtain the best PQPF skill for a large threshold through postprocessing; (3) due to the differences in climates in the North and South of the basin, QPF and PQPF qualities are better in the northern HB than in the southern HB; (4) except for climate, the PQPF skill is also influenced by precipitation type, while the QPF accuracy is affected by terrain. The PQPF is good at forecasting the precipitation caused by ocean effects but not by mountain topography. The QPF accuracy decreases in mountainous areas; and (5) the multimodel superensemble has little effect on PQPF skill improvement but can improve QPF accuracy when raw EPSs have significantly different QPF accuracies.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 529
页数:14
相关论文
共 221 条
[1]  
Aminyavari S(2019)Probabilistic streamflow forecast based on spatial post-processing of TIGGE precipitation forecasts Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 33 1939-1950
[2]  
Saghafian B(2018)Evaluation of TIGGE ensemble forecasts of precipitation in distinct climate regions in Iran Adv Atmos Sci 35 457-468
[3]  
Aminyavari S(2017)Accuracy assessment of rainfall prediction by global models during the landfall of tropical cyclones in the North Indian Ocean Meteorol Appl 24 503-511
[4]  
Saghafian B(2019)Evaluation of a global ensemble flood prediction system in Peru Hydrol Sci J 64 1171-1189
[5]  
Delavar M(2017)Multi-model grand ensemble hydrologic forecasting in the Fu river basin using Bayesian model averaging Water 9 74-686
[6]  
Bhomia S(2018)Probabilistic forecasts of tropical cyclone tracks and intensities in the southwest Indian Ocean basin Q J R Meteorol Soc 145 675-2908
[7]  
Jaiswal N(1999)Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system Q J R Meteorol Soc 125 2887-98
[8]  
Kishtawal CM(2018)Spatial spread-skill relationship in terms of agreement scales for precipitation forecasts in a convection-allowing ensemble Q J R Meteorol Soc 144 85-1418
[9]  
Bischiniotis K(2011)Precipitation forecast skill as a function of ensemble size and spatial scale in a convection-allowing ensemble Mon Weather Rev 139 1410-626
[10]  
van den Hurk B(2009)Ensemble flood forecasting: a review J Hydrol 375 613-38