Formal Legal Truth and Substantive Truth in Judicial Fact-Finding -- Their Justified Divergence in some Particular Cases

被引:0
作者
Robert S. Summers
机构
[1] Cornell Law School,McRoberts Research Professor of Law
关键词
burden of proof; evidence; formal legal truth; jury; legal values; substantive truth; truth;
D O I
10.1023/A:1006327205902
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Truth is a fundamental objective of adjudicative processes; ideally, ‘substantive’ as distinct from ‘formal legal’ truth. But problems of evidence, for example, may frustrate finding of substantive truth; other values may lead to exclusions of probative evidence, e.g., for the sake of fairness. ‘Jury nullification’ and ‘jury equity’. Limits of time, and definitiveness of decision, require allocation of burden of proof. Degree of truth-formality is variable within a system and across systems.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 511
页数:14
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据