Validation and development of composite indices for measuring vulnerability to earthquakes using a socio-economic perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Christopher G. Burton
Miguel Toquica
Khan Mortuza Bin Asad
Michael Musori
机构
[1] University of Connecticut,Department of Geography
[2] Global Earthquake Model,Department of Geography
[3] Texas State University,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2022年 / 111卷
关键词
Social vulnerability; Economic vulnerability; Recovery; Disaster resilience; Earthquakes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While many approaches for assessing earthquake risk exist within the literature and practice, it is the dynamic interrelationships between earthquake hazard, physical risk, and the social conditions of populations that are the focal point for disaster risk reduction. Here, the measurement of vulnerability to earthquakes (i.e., characteristics that create the potential for harm or loss) has become a major focus area. However, metrics aimed at measuring vulnerability to earthquakes suffer from several key limitations. For instance, hazard and community context are often ignored, and attempts to validate metrics are largely non-existent. The purpose of this paper is to produce composite indices of the vulnerability of countries to earthquakes within three topical areas: social vulnerability, economic vulnerability, and recovery potential. To improve upon the status quo in indicators development for measuring vulnerability to seismic events, our starting point was to: (1) define a set of indicators that are context specific to earthquakes as defined by the literature; (2) delineate indicators within categorical areas of vulnerability that are easy to understand and could be put into practical use by DRR practitioners; and (3) propose indicators that are validated using historical earthquake impacts. When mapped, the geographic variations in the differential susceptibility of populations and economies to the adverse effects of damaging earthquake impacts become evident, as does differential ability of countries to recover from them. Drivers of this geographic variation include average country debt, the type and density of infrastructure, poverty, governance, and educational attainment, to name just a few.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1334
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measuring Socio-economic Factors and Sensitivity of Happiness
    Hideyuki Mizobuchi
    Journal of Happiness Studies, 2017, 18 : 463 - 504
  • [42] Measuring Socio-economic Factors and Sensitivity of Happiness
    Mizobuchi, Hideyuki
    JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2017, 18 (02) : 463 - 504
  • [43] Socio-economic vulnerability and deaths of despair in Brazilian counties
    de Carvalho, Wellington Roberto Gomes
    Meira, Karina Cardoso
    de Medeiros, Aline Grimberg Pereira
    Neves, Luise Bernardes da Silva
    Vardiero, Nicole Almeida
    Guimaraes, Raphael Mendonca
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2024, 38
  • [44] Socio-economic vulnerability and losses of flood in Lampung, Indonesia
    Chayyani, N. R.
    Gravitiani, E.
    Suryanto
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLIMATE CHANGE 2019 (4TH ICCC 2019), 2020, 423
  • [45] Environmental and socio-economic vulnerability of agricultural sector in Armenia
    Melkonyan, Ani
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 488 : 333 - 342
  • [46] Analysis of the Relationship Between Islamicity Indices and Global Socio-Economic Development Indices: 2015-2018
    Ayyildiz, A. Bulend
    Sayilgan, Guven
    MALIYE DERGISI, 2021, (180): : 165 - 190
  • [47] THE INFLUENCE OF ECONOMIC MENTALITY ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
    Halushka, Z.
    Zapukhlyak, V
    Klevchik, L.
    Luste, O.
    Storoshchuk, B.
    FINANCIAL AND CREDIT ACTIVITY-PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 1 (42): : 283 - 292
  • [48] System for Measuring the Socio-Economic Sustainability of the Eurasian Economic Union
    Ryazantsev, Sergey, V
    Rostovskaya, Tamara K.
    Zolotareva, Olga A.
    EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION, 2021, 17 (03): : 971 - 986
  • [49] Lifestock in Orissa: The socio-economic perspective.
    Barik, Bishnu C.
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2007, 24 (04) : 539 - 540
  • [50] COVID-19: A Socio-economic Perspective
    Kanupriya
    FIIB BUSINESS REVIEW, 2020, 9 (03) : 161 - 166