Echocardiography and EuroSCORE II for the stratification of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

被引:0
作者
Yan Fan
Hong Shen
Brandon Stacey
David Zhao
Robert J. Applegate
Neal D. Kon
Edward H. Kincaid
Sanjay K. Gandhi
Min Pu
机构
[1] Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center,Section on Cardiovascular Medicine
[2] Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center,Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery
[3] Peking University,First Hospital
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2021年 / 37卷
关键词
Aortic stenosis; EuroSCORE II; Echocardiography; Aortic valve intervention;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to explore the utility of echocardiography and the EuroSCORE II in stratifying patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (LG SAS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%) with or without aortic valve intervention (AVI). The study included 323 patients with LG SAS (aortic valve area ≤ 1.0 cm2 and mean pressure gradient < 40 mmHg). Patients were divided into two groups: a high-risk group (EuroSCORE II ≥ 4%, n = 115) and a low-risk group (EuroSCORE II < 4%, n = 208). Echocardiographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed. All-cause mortality was used as a clinical outcome during mean follow-up of 2 ± 1.3 years. Two-year cumulative survival was significantly lower in the high-risk group than the low-risk patients (62.3% vs. 81.7%, p = 0.001). AVI tended to reduce mortality in the high-risk patients (70% vs. 59%; p = 0.065). It did not significantly reduce mortality in the low-risk patients (82.8% with AVI vs. 81.2%, p = 0.68). Multivariable analysis identified heart failure, renal dysfunction and stroke volume index (SVi) as independent predictors for mortality. The study suggested that individualization of AVI based on risk stratification could be considered in a patient with LG SAS and preserved LVEF.
引用
收藏
页码:3169 / 3176
页数:7
相关论文
共 212 条
[1]  
Nishimura RA(2017)2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines Circulation 135 1159-1195
[2]  
Otto CM(2013)Severe aortic valve stenosis with normal left ventricular function and low vs. high pressure gradient: different hemodynamic profiles but similar clinical presentation, comorbidity and outcome Int J Cardiol 167 2326-2328
[3]  
Bonow RO(2013)Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcome of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction Circulation 128 622-631
[4]  
Carabello BA(2015)Prognostic value of paradoxical low-gradient severe aortic stenosis in Japan: Japanese Multicenter Aortic Stenosis Study, Retrospective (JUST-R) Registry J Cardiol 65 360-368
[5]  
Erwin JP(2011)Outcome of patients with low-gradient “severe” aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction Circulation 123 887-895
[6]  
Fleisher LA(2015)Watchful observation versus early aortic valve replacement for symptomatic patients with normal flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis Heart 101 1375-1381
[7]  
Rossi A(2015)Low-gradient, low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: characteristics, outcome, and implication for surgery J Am Coll Cardiol 65 55-66
[8]  
Nistri S(2016)Clinical outcomes in different types of aortic stenosis as assessed by Doppler echocardiography J Heart Valve Dis 25 672-678
[9]  
Cioffi G(2014)Clinical presentation and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with low flow/low gradient severe aortic stenosis Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 84 283-290
[10]  
Tomasi C(2015)Outcome and impact of aortic valve replacement in patients with preserved LV ejection fraction and low gradient aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis J Am Coll Cardiol 66 2594-2603