Assessment of Nonstationarity and Uncertainty in Precipitation Extremes of a River Basin Under Climate Change

被引:0
作者
S. Ansa Thasneem
N. R. Chithra
Santosh G. Thampi
机构
[1] National Institute of Technology Calicut,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
Environmental Modeling & Assessment | 2021年 / 26卷
关键词
Climate change; Nonstationarity; Extreme precipitation; Uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, an uncertainty analysis of extreme precipitation return levels was performed for the Chaliyar river basin, India, under representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 4.5 and 8.5. Weighted average projections of various climate models (for RCPs 4.5 and 8.5) using reliability ensemble averaging were used in the analysis for projecting the future extremes. To start with, the presence of nonstationarity in the observed annual maximum precipitation (AMP) series and the future ensemble averaged AMP projections were investigated. For this purpose, three generalized extreme value (GEV) models—one stationary model with constant parameters and two nonstationary models with trends in location and scale parameters—were applied to assess the goodness of fit using Akaike information criterion and likelihood ratio test. The best fit model was used in the uncertainty analysis, and the confidence bounds of extreme precipitation return levels were estimated. A nonparametric bootstrapping approach was followed in the uncertainty analysis. Results of the study suggest that a nonstationary GEV distribution with linear trend in location parameter and constant scale and shape parameters are the best fit distribution for the AMP series under the RCP scenarios, whereas the stationary GEV distribution fits the observed AMP series the best. The expected values and confidence bounds of return levels obtained from the uncertainty analysis reveal that precipitation extremes in the river basin would intensify under the projected climate change scenarios. Compared with the RCP4.5 scenario, the confidence intervals of return levels under the RCP8.5 scenario were wider, implying that uncertainty in the latter scenario is higher.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 312
页数:17
相关论文
共 244 条
[31]  
Mukherjee S(2018)Covariate and parameter uncertainty in non-stationary rainfall IDF curve International Journal of Climatology 54 507-1841
[32]  
Aadhar S(2009)Flood frequency analysis for nonstationary annual peak records in an urban drainage basin Advances in Water Resources 24 673-207
[33]  
Stone D(2005)Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 31 1825-459
[34]  
Mishra V(2010)A flexible nonlinear modelling framework for nonstationary generalized extreme value analysis in hydroclimatology Hydrological Processes 10 187-1446
[35]  
Revadekar JV(2017)Non-stationary rainfall intensity-duration-frequency relationship: a comparison between annual maximum and partial duration series Water Resources Management 6 453-36
[36]  
Patwardhan SK(1996)Estimation of quantiles and confidence intervals for the log-Gumbel distribution Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics 19 1438-124
[37]  
Rupa Kumar K(2001)Uncertainty assessment of regionalized flood frequency estimates Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 77 17-1532
[38]  
Jenkinson AF(2013)Quantifying the uncertainty of design floods under nonstationary conditions Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 93 109-4991
[39]  
Katz RW(2015)Stationarity is undead: Uncertainty dominates the distribution of extremes Advances in Water Resources 27 1517-597
[40]  
Parlange MB(2018)Assessment of uncertainty in estimating future flood return levels under climate change Natural Hazards 22 04017042-720