The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering

被引:0
作者
John Sutton
Celia B. Harris
Paul G. Keil
Amanda J. Barnier
机构
[1] Macquarie University,Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science
来源
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences | 2010年 / 9卷
关键词
Extended cognition; Distributed cognition; Collaborative recall; Memory; Social memory; Transactive memory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper introduces a new, expanded range of relevant cognitive psychological research on collaborative recall and social memory to the philosophical debate on extended and distributed cognition. We start by examining the case for extended cognition based on the complementarity of inner and outer resources, by which neural, bodily, social, and environmental resources with disparate but complementary properties are integrated into hybrid cognitive systems, transforming or augmenting the nature of remembering or decision-making. Adams and Aizawa, noting this distinctive complementarity argument, say that they agree with it completely: but they describe it as “a non-revolutionary approach” which leaves “the cognitive psychology of memory as the study of processes that take place, essentially without exception, within nervous systems.” In response, we carve out, on distinct conceptual and empirical grounds, a rich middle ground between internalist forms of cognitivism and radical anti-cognitivism. Drawing both on extended cognition literature and on Sterelny’s account of the “scaffolded mind” (this issue), we develop a multidimensional framework for understanding varying relations between agents and external resources, both technological and social. On this basis we argue that, independent of any more “revolutionary” metaphysical claims about the partial constitution of cognitive processes by external resources, a thesis of scaffolded or distributed cognition can substantially influence or transform explanatory practice in cognitive science. Critics also cite various empirical results as evidence against the idea that remembering can extend beyond skull and skin. We respond with a more principled, representative survey of the scientific psychology of memory, focussing in particular on robust recent empirical traditions for the study of collaborative recall and transactive social memory. We describe our own empirical research on socially distributed remembering, aimed at identifying conditions for mnemonic emergence in collaborative groups. Philosophical debates about extended, embedded, and distributed cognition can thus make richer, mutually beneficial contact with independently motivated research programs in the cognitive psychology of memory.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 560
页数:39
相关论文
共 160 条
[1]  
Adams F(2010)Why we still need a mark of the cognitive Cognitive Systems Research 11 324-331
[2]  
Adams F(2001)The bounds of cognition Philosophical Psychology 14 43-64
[3]  
Aizawa K(2003)Why are you telling me that? A conceptual model of the social function of autobiographical memory Memory 11 165-178
[4]  
Alea N(2003)Rethinking interference theory: executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting Journal of Memory and Language 49 415-445
[5]  
Bluck S(1994)Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 1063-1087
[6]  
Anderson MC(2010)From cognition’s location to the epistemology of its nature Cognitive Systems Research 11 357-366
[7]  
Anderson MC(2008)From individual to collective memory: theoretical and empirical perspectives Memory 16 177-182
[8]  
Bjork RA(2004)Retrieval-induced forgetting of emotional and unemotional autobiographical memories Cognition and Emotion 18 457-477
[9]  
Bjork EL(2008)A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: the case of memory Cognitive Systems Research 9 33-51
[10]  
Barker MJ(2000)Costs and benefits of collaborative remembering Applied Cognitive Psychology 14 497-507