Value of shear wave arrival time contour display in shear wave elastography for breast masses diagnosis

被引:0
作者
Bang-Guo Zhou
Dan Wang
Wei-Wei Ren
Xiao-Long Li
Ya-Ping He
Bo-Ji Liu
Qiao Wang
Shi-Gao Chen
Azra Alizad
Hui-Xiong Xu
机构
[1] Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital,Department of Medical Ultrasound
[2] Ultrasound Research and Education Institute,Department of Radiology
[3] Tongji University School of Medicine,undefined
[4] Thyroid Institute,undefined
[5] Tongji University School of Medicine,undefined
[6] Mayo Clinic,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 7卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of shear wave arrival time contour (SWATC) display for the diagnosis of breast lesions and to identify factors associated with the quality of shear wave propagation (QSWP) in breast lesions. This study included 277 pathologically confirmed breast lesions. Conventional B-mode ultrasound characteristics and shear wave elastography parameters were computed. Using the SWATC display, the QSWP of each lesion was assigned to a two-point scale: score 1 (low quality) and score 2 (high quality). Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with QSWP. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for QSWP to differentiate benign from malignant lesions was 0.913, with a sensitivity of 91.9%, a specificity of 90.7%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 74.0%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.5%. Compared with using the standard deviation of shear wave speed (SWSSD) alone, SWSSD combined with QSWP increased the sensitivity from 75.8% to 93.5%, but decreased the specificity from 95.8% to 89.3% (P < 0.05). SWSSD was identified to be the strongest factor associated with the QSWP, followed by tumor malignancy and the depth of the lesion. In conclusion, SWATC display may be useful for characterization of breast lesions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Barr RG(2012)Sonographic breast elastography: a primer J Ultrasound Med 31 773-783
[2]  
Shiina T(2015)WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology Ultrasound Med Bio 41 1126-1147
[3]  
Athanasiou A(2010)Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging–preliminary results Radiology 256 297-303
[4]  
Cosgrove DO(2012)Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible Eur radiol 22 1023-1032
[5]  
Bai M(2012)Virtual touch tissue quantification using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: initial clinical experience with solid breast masses J Ultrasound Med 31 289-294
[6]  
Du L(2011)Preliminary results of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) ultrasound imaging of breast lesions Ultrasound Med Bio 37 1436-1443
[7]  
Gu J(2016)Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance Eur radiol 26 3290-3300
[8]  
Li F(2015)Shear-wave elastography of the breast: value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography Radiology 275 45-53
[9]  
Jia X(2015)WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 2: breast Ultrasound Med Bio 41 1148-1160
[10]  
Meng W(2015)Effect of calcifications on breast ultrasound shear wave elastography: an investigational study Plos one 10 e0137898-109